12 Comments

You must mean " The Hypocrite" oath that these coward doctors took... You know the doctors who committed treason during the scamdemic plandemic.. You know the millions of doctors who were silenced by a few, you cannot get anymore of a cowards then that.. You have the EVIL enemy outnumbered beyond belief, but you let them silence you with bonus money... You doctors who did not stand up are not worth fighting anymore wars for, you are no longer worth the sacrifice of brave soldiers who fought for you on foreign shores, when you could not even fight by just standing and speaking truth here at home.. Pathetic doctors who I for one no longer have any respect for.. I will always promote holistic doctors over allopathic doctors from now on..

Expand full comment

For sure, they took the "Hypocritic Oath", which is to make as much money as possible at the expense of their patient's health without one iota of concern, as to their wellbeing.

Expand full comment

I approve this message..

Expand full comment

I took the oath many, many, years ago and meant every word. Over the years though,sadly, I stated calling it the Hypocrites Oath. Truly sad,to see the medical field become so uncaring and greedy because of Big Pharma

Expand full comment

The Hippocratic Oath is passé nowadays. It's considered a relic of past times, less than 15% take it. But they let us think they all do. To pacify us, keep us trusting them. A useful lie of omission. Happy that we make the assumption most take it.

Culture of death: the assault on medical ethics in America

Wesley A Smith, 2000

https://archive.org/details/cultureofdeath00wesl

Smith's Follow up book:

Culture of Death, The Age of "Do Harm" Medicine

Discovery Institute, 2016

https://www.discovery.org/b/culture-of-death/

"Smith warns that future troubles could be tied to the fact that only 14% of doctors today report having taken the Hippocratic oath to “do no harm.” Smith even recounts episodes of doctors recommending that the old or sick be denied basic treatments which might potentially save life. This enlightening book unmasks unexpected occurrences in the present practice of medicine, and shines light into a future that many of us might not like."

This book describes the complicity of the medical profession in the greatest crime against humanity the world has ever known...up to now:

Useless Eaters: Disability as Genocidal Marker in Nazi Germany

The Journal of Special Education/Catholic Culture, 2002

https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7019

"Complicity of the Medical Professions

It is important to note that the enactment of prejudice against people with disabilities in Nazi Germany could not have succeeded without the complicity of the medical and adjunct professions. Power over life and death was placed firmly in the hands of physicians who became white-coated executioners, having long abandoned the "do no harm" clause of the Hippocratic Oath. Currently, there is evidence of the medical community's again being willing agents in hastening the deaths of people deemed not viable, including people with disabilities, through familiar methods for ending the lives of terminally ill people, such as starvation and death by thirst. Furthermore, there is evidence that "do no harm" is now viewed as a somewhat quaint throwback to a distant, less sophisticated era. For example, many physicians no longer take the Hippocratic Oath before beginning their careers, and many standard hospital treatment protocols now stipulate that staff physicians may override next-of-kin requests for patient treatment if the physician decides that treatment will likely be ineffective (Smith, 2000). Once again, patients, including those with disabilities who are terminally ill, now bear the responsibility of justifying their existence and their need for treatment. This being the case, and with the clear understanding that not all physicians put the greater good ahead of their individual patients, there should at least be some debate about what this means for people with disabilities, many of whom rely extensively on the assumption that their physicians have their best individual treatment interests at heart and will treat them regardless of utilitarian arguments to the contrary."

FF - What's old is new again. If history doesn't repeat then it often rhymes. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Any other appropriate clichés?

Expand full comment

It really sounds very masonic to me

Expand full comment

It’s like the Hippocratic Oaf now.

Thanks Dr.

Expand full comment

I never looked into what the Oath actually said, so I'm glad to learn today.

How amazing that it contains what it does. Nowadays my guess is that many would say, "How quaint!"

Thanks for posting Edwin!

Expand full comment

I try to never miss Dr. Coleman! And your are welcome.

Expand full comment

💯

Expand full comment

Thanks Kenn, for the restack which is appreciated ver much.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the restacks, Bill and Barbara, they are so very much appreciated.

Expand full comment