Hitler and the Nazis would have voted for the UK Euthanasia Bill
Dr Vernon Coleman
Do you know who first said: ‘Physicians have been empowered to grant a mercy death to patients considered incurable – the mentally ill and the handicapped.’?
I wouldn’t be surprised if you’d thought the quote came from one of the supporters of the UK Parliament’s Bill on euthanasia – death by doctor – due to be debated this week.
But actually that policy statement was made in October 1939, and the author was a well-known ‘medical expert’ known as Adolf Hitler.
Hitler’s policy, which seems to me to bear an uncomfortably close relationship to the official policy of the UK’s National Health Service these days, was created in 1920 in a book written by a psychiatrist and a lawyer (what a deadly combination) who argued that the resultant economic savings justified killing those with ‘useless lives’.
The policy was to kill the incurably ill and the physically or mentally disabled and the elderly.
Hitler’s policy was officially discontinued in 1941 when it seems that even the Nazis found it a bit much.
But during the early months of 2020 the NHS was regularly following Hitler’s advice: refusing to provide life-saving treatment for the elderly, the disabled or the frail.
And now hundreds of campaigners want to introduce Hitler’s policy into the UK.
Killing patients solely because of their age or fitness is a form of eugenics.
There doesn’t seem to me to be all that much difference between the thinking behind the bill under debate in the House of Commons and the policy of Adolf Hitler’s Germany.
If euthanasia is legalised in the UK then the NHS will have been thoroughly Nazified and Hitler would be proud of modern Britain.
NOTE
There’s still time (just) to make sure that British MPs (the only ones who have a vote) understand the danger of euthanasia. Please send them copies of my video entitled `They want to KILL you. Here’s how they’ll do it’ (Click Here). And please put copies of the video on other platforms including YouTube. And to understand the full horrors of euthanasia please read Jack King’s book `They want to kill us’ (Click Here)
Anybody needing a dose of pessimism, sprinkled with some humor, should read/watch Dr. Coleman. He even manages to slip some truth in. There is little consolation that the US is a few microns (or is it nanos) in better shape than England. In the end, in England they crave a few pints at the local pub and in the US a few six packs wherever they can. People that are raving about Trump's cabinet appointees are in for bitter disappointment. The reality is that the Deep Swamp and the Bankers Cabal control the US. It is all a political show to appease the masses. Is it really any wonder that the planet is on the edge of annihilation?
In the 1970's, by the time your breast cancer was detected, you had a palpable tumor. Now, if you participate in screening, cancers measured in millimeters are detected. Pre-cancers (carcinoma in situ) are detected, as well. During my 25 years in training and practice, turnaround time from the time of biopsy to diagnosis has routinely been one to two business days. Three or four, if your location is remote and tissue gets transported to a lab for processing. And that result usually includes biomarkers. In some centers, a woman can get a biopsy the same day she has a positive mammogram. Cancer diagnosis in the 1970's in no way compares to cancer diagnosis in 2024, or even 2004. At least in the USA.
Same drugs will kill you in the UK, too, if you choose to go that way. That's a different risk/benefit analysis, though, compared to an experimental immunotherapy delivery device to prevent a cold. And I would completely agree with you, if you wanted to argue that the American cancer care model is for getting patients into the system and transferring wealth to corporations. Some people do well with it. Some spend six weeks in the infusion therapy chair in exchange for six weeks of progression free survival.
Again bullshit. Of course RFK jnr tried hard to stay with the Democrats, the party of his father and uncle. But the Dems rejected him and ran a vicious smear campaign on him. Edwin I get it you prefer the contrarian view, so do I but in these times of significant change it's just not enough.
Hitler and the Nazis would have voted for the UK Euthanasia Bill
Dr Vernon Coleman
Do you know who first said: ‘Physicians have been empowered to grant a mercy death to patients considered incurable – the mentally ill and the handicapped.’?
I wouldn’t be surprised if you’d thought the quote came from one of the supporters of the UK Parliament’s Bill on euthanasia – death by doctor – due to be debated this week.
But actually that policy statement was made in October 1939, and the author was a well-known ‘medical expert’ known as Adolf Hitler.
Hitler’s policy, which seems to me to bear an uncomfortably close relationship to the official policy of the UK’s National Health Service these days, was created in 1920 in a book written by a psychiatrist and a lawyer (what a deadly combination) who argued that the resultant economic savings justified killing those with ‘useless lives’.
The policy was to kill the incurably ill and the physically or mentally disabled and the elderly.
Hitler’s policy was officially discontinued in 1941 when it seems that even the Nazis found it a bit much.
But during the early months of 2020 the NHS was regularly following Hitler’s advice: refusing to provide life-saving treatment for the elderly, the disabled or the frail.
And now hundreds of campaigners want to introduce Hitler’s policy into the UK.
Killing patients solely because of their age or fitness is a form of eugenics.
There doesn’t seem to me to be all that much difference between the thinking behind the bill under debate in the House of Commons and the policy of Adolf Hitler’s Germany.
If euthanasia is legalised in the UK then the NHS will have been thoroughly Nazified and Hitler would be proud of modern Britain.
NOTE
There’s still time (just) to make sure that British MPs (the only ones who have a vote) understand the danger of euthanasia. Please send them copies of my video entitled `They want to KILL you. Here’s how they’ll do it’ (Click Here). And please put copies of the video on other platforms including YouTube. And to understand the full horrors of euthanasia please read Jack King’s book `They want to kill us’ (Click Here)
Copyright Vernon Coleman November 2024
Love him.
Anybody needing a dose of pessimism, sprinkled with some humor, should read/watch Dr. Coleman. He even manages to slip some truth in. There is little consolation that the US is a few microns (or is it nanos) in better shape than England. In the end, in England they crave a few pints at the local pub and in the US a few six packs wherever they can. People that are raving about Trump's cabinet appointees are in for bitter disappointment. The reality is that the Deep Swamp and the Bankers Cabal control the US. It is all a political show to appease the masses. Is it really any wonder that the planet is on the edge of annihilation?
In the 1970's, by the time your breast cancer was detected, you had a palpable tumor. Now, if you participate in screening, cancers measured in millimeters are detected. Pre-cancers (carcinoma in situ) are detected, as well. During my 25 years in training and practice, turnaround time from the time of biopsy to diagnosis has routinely been one to two business days. Three or four, if your location is remote and tissue gets transported to a lab for processing. And that result usually includes biomarkers. In some centers, a woman can get a biopsy the same day she has a positive mammogram. Cancer diagnosis in the 1970's in no way compares to cancer diagnosis in 2024, or even 2004. At least in the USA.
In the US, of course, the drugs may kill you.
Same drugs will kill you in the UK, too, if you choose to go that way. That's a different risk/benefit analysis, though, compared to an experimental immunotherapy delivery device to prevent a cold. And I would completely agree with you, if you wanted to argue that the American cancer care model is for getting patients into the system and transferring wealth to corporations. Some people do well with it. Some spend six weeks in the infusion therapy chair in exchange for six weeks of progression free survival.
I agree with number 2 . Wake up pediatricians .
He approached Harris first, was turned down and then went with Trump.
Bullshit
In his own WORDS.
Again bullshit. Of course RFK jnr tried hard to stay with the Democrats, the party of his father and uncle. But the Dems rejected him and ran a vicious smear campaign on him. Edwin I get it you prefer the contrarian view, so do I but in these times of significant change it's just not enough.
It isn’t enough! But it is all we got!
💯💯💯💯