Crooks are now able to merge photos of two similar looking people and create one image. Unfortunately, biometric security devices can’t distinguish between the spoofed photo and each of the two individuals. So because they can’t find the ‘person’ whose deep fake image is on a wanted poster (because they don’t exist) the police will arrest the two people whose photos were spoofed. Welcome to the Great Reset and the wonders of digitalisation.
Despite all the fuss about wind farms and solar energy, the consumption of oil rose in 2022 by about 3%. And idiotic protestors interfering with sporting events aren’t going to change that trend any time soon. The really big problem, of course, is that the oil is running out. Read all about it in my book A Bigger Problem than Climate Change. The CIA and controlled opposition dispute this but the acknowledged fact that the oil is running out was, three quarters of a century ago, one of the triggers for the globalists’ depopulation plan.
The market for coal is rising. In 2022, coal prices in Europe averaged £235 a tonne (that is a 145% increase on the previous year). Germany has now closed its nuclear power plants (for absolutely no good reason other than that the silly greenies didn’t like them). Last year a third of the electricity in Germany was produced by coal fired power plants, and the closure of the nuclear power plants means that the consumption of coal to make electricity will be much higher in the next twelve months.
Coal is by far the dominant fuel for power generation in China. And likely to remain so for some time. Burning coal is much better for the planet than burning wood pellets (which is very popular in the UK.)
I foolishly bought insurance to cover our plumbing and drains. When we had a blocked drain I rang for help. They sent a man who was no help whatsoever. He stayed a few minutes and then left. For four days we rang numerous times and were told that help was on the way. It wasn’t. In the end we had to hire a local firm to deal with the problem. The insurers sent us a cheque for £80 in compensation for failing to help. But they refused to pay for the repair because we hadn’t been given permission to get an outside expert. I have cancelled the insurance and learned another lesson.
It is possible for a woman to give birth to twins fathered by two different men. In 1970, in Germany, blood tests led to a court ruling that although a woman had given birth to twins, one of her babies was illegitimate.
Politicians waste 90% of the money they gouge out of taxpayers – doling it out to cronies and crooks. They steal the other 10%. I regard paying tax as paying protection money. If I don’t pay, thugs will come round and break my bones.
Anyone buying biofuel for a car or other machine is condemning someone to death from starvation. Food is for eating, not to be used as a substitute for oil.
In the 15th century all you had to do to destroy someone was to accuse them of being a witch. One accusation would result in certain death. (The accused would, for example, be thrown into a pond. If they lived they were guilty and they were burnt to death. If they drowned they were innocent.) The same system has been revived. Anyone accused of being an anti-vaxxer or a climate change denier is ruined. Anyone accused of sexism or racism is considered guilty until proved innocent. And the power of social media means that they are destroyed even if they can prove themselves innocent.
My bet is that the World Government the conspirators are planning will be centred in Israel. Just a hunch.
Peeping Toms used to be immune from prosecution if they were over 50-years-old or had only one eye.
Doctors’ stethoscopes are often contaminated with dangerous bugs such as staphylococci and can spread infections from one patient to another. Less than 10% of doctors have ever cleaned their stethoscopes. For advice on surviving doctors read my book How to Stop Your Doctor Killing You. It’s banned in China and Germany (for upsetting governments, drug companies and the medical establishment) and heaven knows where else, though I’m delighted to say that there are still versions in Portuguese and Polish.
Elvis Presley used to have a motorised exercise bike. (I suppose the alternative was to buy an ordinary exercise bike and get someone else to ride it for him.)
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, is a member of the Board of Trustees of the World Economic Forum. Hands up anyone who is surprised by this revelation. When she addressed the Davos shindig in 2022, she called for global unity. It is absolutely no surprise that she is apparently Biden’s choice as leader of NATO. We shall then have to address her as Corporal von der Leyen.
Banks in the UK have been told by the Government they must respect the free speech of their customers – and not close their accounts just because they do not have woke views. Banks have also been told that they should stop profiteering by charging 6% or 7% for mortgages and paying 0.1% to savers. It’ll be a surprise if they take any notice.
Snitching is becoming a global pastime. The BBC reports (with glee I suspect) that in 2022, 48,754 sneaks contacted the DVLA with concerns about someone else’s fitness to drive. That figure is up from 26,716 in 2021. Inevitably, most of those complaints concerned older drivers though, as insurance companies will confirm, it is younger drivers who cause most accidents. The medium term plan is clearly to take driving licences away from older drivers (to begin with it will be those over 70, though this age limit will fall rapidly and in a few years those over 40 years of age will have their licences taken away from them). Since there are very few bus services these days, this will force older citizens into tiny flats in tower blocks, just as recommended by the globalists.
Long covid (the fashionable non-existent disease that lasts a lifetime) is now found most commonly among doctors, nurses and hospital staff.
The greatest western movie ever made was Shane with Alan Ladd. I’ve just read, for the first time, Jack Schaefer’s short story on which the film was based. It is a beautifully written story, which transcends an often underestimated genre and is a greater, truer piece of literature than anything which has ever won a literary prize.
The mainstream media claims the world just had its hottest day ever. This absurd claim made my blood boil. (Actually, it’s been so cold recently that I’m thinking of putting the central heating back on. And have you noticed that even if it is pleasantly warm in the daytime it gets very cold at night? That’s a sure sign that they’re fiddling with the weather – which we know they are.)
The US Federal Communications Commission has granted permission for 440,000 5G satellite launches. And that’s just launches from the US. You’d think the damned things would all be bumping into one another, wouldn’t you?
The following article is taken from my book The Dementia Myth:
‘My experience is that issues which are unpopular with the drug companies (the usefulness of vivisection or the questioning of the value and safety of vaccination for example) are ignored by all medical journals.
Medical journalists writing for popular papers often quote articles which have appeared in The Lancet but it is, I think, worth pointing out that The Lancet is a commercial journal which charges a good deal of money for advertising. The latest circulation figures for the weekly magazine show that back in 2007 it sold 29,103 copies and yet despite this relatively modest circulation, a full page advert in The Lancet can cost up to £10,800 (though it will be considerably more than that if you want to buy the back cover). I can only offer the circulation rate for 2007 because, even in 2019, that was the only figure I could find on The Lancet’s website.
Now compare that advertising rate with a magazine that, it is fair to assume, does not take a good deal of drug company advertising. At random I picked a magazine called Model Rail Magazine. It has a circulation of 28,337. And the most expensive page rate for a full page is £900.
So, an advert in The Lancet costs more than ten times as much as an advert in Model Rail Magazine.
And who buys the advertising in The Lancet?
Well, if you guessed that most of it was paid for by drug companies then you probably would not be far off the mark.
And who makes vaccines?
Well, drug companies of course.
Am I being unfair in fearing that there could be a conflict of interest here?
I don’t think so.
I would have more respect for The Lancet (and its point of view) if the magazine refused all drug company advertising and relied entirely on subscription fees. It is worth noting that a subscription to The Lancet costs £163 whereas a subscription to Model Rail Magazine costs £51. Moreover, I doubt if The Lancet pays much if anything to its contributors whereas Model Rail Magazine doubtless has quite a substantial editorial cost.
This astonishing discrepancy in advertising rates is commonplace within the world of medical publishing. There are thousands of medical journals and magazines in existence around the world and many of them are hugely profitable. Drug companies use their journal advertising to promote drugs directly to the doctors with the prescription pads.
The drug companies use charities to indoctrinate patients and they use medical journals to indoctrinate doctors.’
My long-running campaign against the General Medical Council (the UK body which gives licences to doctors and then seems to me to take them away if doctors dare to tell the truth or behave ethically) is bearing fruit.
I’m delighted – though slightly startled - to see that the British Medical Association (‘the patients’ enemy’) agrees with my views on the GMC.
The General Medical Council is, in my opinion, useless and dangerous. It needs to be closed down immediately. In my view, the staff sometimes appear rude or uppity, don’t understand the extent and limit of their responsibilities, and don’t seem to realise that their (essentially subservient) role in life is merely to protect patients.
On 25th April 2023, I published an article headed ‘Here’s why cowardly doctors didn’t dare stand up and tell the truth about covid and the jab’.
I explained that the GMC had struck doctors off the register (and removed their licences to practise) if they dared question the official, false claim that the world was threatened with a covid pandemic.
And I explained that this was why so many doctors didn’t dare to speak out and tell the truth about the over-marketed flu bug or expose the dangers of the experimental covid-19 `vaccine’.
The hundreds of officious and expensive administrators at the GMC must bear responsibility for the many death and injuries caused by a vaccine that was never fit for use, that didn’t do what it was supposed to do and which did cause a mass of serious health problems – such as death.
Because of the GMC, doctors were too terrified to speak out against the medical establishment. They saw what had happened to colleagues who dared to share their views with their colleagues and the general public. They say that doctors who dared to speak out had their licences removed by the GMC and were, in addition, vilified by the media.
The truth, so well hidden during the last three years, is that the medical establishment was, as it has been for decades, controlled by the pharmaceutical industry and instead of looking at the facts, licensing authorities around the world merely did as they were told to do.
The tragedy is that numerous doctors lost their licences, and their livelihoods, because they dared to speak out and tell the truth. The majority of doctors, seeing what had happened to those who spoke out, kept quiet and betrayed their patients, themselves and their profession. Those gutless wimps should be ashamed.
Now there are two reasons why truth-tellers can celebrate.
First, I am delighted to report that the BMA’s Annual Representative Meeting has passed a no confidence vote for the GMC and will now call for its leaders to be sacked.
The BMA motion said that `too many’ Medical Practitioners Tribunal Services fitness to practise decisions are `disproportionate to the error of the doctors mistake’ and expressed no confidence in the current tribunal.
Doctors voted for a motion calling for the leadership team of the GMC to be dismissed and replaced with a team that `commands the confidence and support of the medical profession’.
The BMA hasn’t yet quite joined me in calling for the entire GMC to be closed down and replaced. But they’re getting close!
Second, Dr Mohammad Adil, the brave surgeon who was struck off the medical register in the UK for daring to air his opinions about the covid fraud, is now taking the GMC to court. On 19th October 2023 his case will be heard at the Royal Court of Justice in London. Dr Adil had his licence taken from for no good reason three years ago. He has been unable to work for all that time.
His crime? Speaking out.
In the United Kingdom, where doctors are licensed by the General Medical Council, an organisation which is, in theory at least, a charity but which appears to have some of the worst qualities of a quango, a government department and an enforcer for the drug industry. I believe that drug companies control governments, they control the medical establishment and, it appears, they may also control the UK’s medical licensing authority – the General Medical Council.
The GMC has become infamous for its extraordinarily one-sided defence of the exaggerated covid pandemic and the pointless but enormously dangerous covid vaccine.
When the fake pandemic was first promoted with enthusiasm in February and March 2020, I immediately described the covid scare a hoax. The figures available proved without any question that the danger of what was clearly merely a rebranded annual flu had been massively exaggerated by people who had a bad track record at assessing the relevant figures. In the UK, the Government’s own official advisors agreed with me, dismissing the covid-19 infection as being no more dangerous than the annual flu. Their expert advice appears to have been ignored in favour of advice from a mathematician with a terrible track record.
The conspirators behind the exaggerated risk (and I use the word conspirators deliberately) did not like my description of the covid scare as a hoax (a video I made was seen by many millions within days) and I was quickly demonised and lied about in the media. The GMC couldn’t take away my licence because their own administrative rules meant that, as with many doctors, my retirement from active practise meant that I’d had to give up my licence. But younger doctors, those still in practice, were to feel the full wrath of the drug company controlled medical establishment.
So, for example, consider the case of Dr Mohammad Adil who, until three years ago was a respected surgeon working in the NHS. Three years ago Dr Adil criticised the government line on covid, and the GMC responded by taking away his licence – meaning that he could no longer practise as a surgeon or, as a doctor in any capacity.
Today, after three years of unemployment, Dr Adil still doesn’t have his licence. The cost to him has been extraordinary. And we should not forget the cost to the NHS. If we consider that in that three years he could have performed 1,000 operations a year – not an unlikely number – then his three year banishment means that 3,000 patients have been denied the operations they needed.
After several hearings, the GMC has still refused to give Dr Adil back his licence. Dr Adil is not alone. I know of several other doctors in the UK who have had their licences removed for criticising the absurd and indefensible covid policy.
And exactly the same thing has been happening around the world where licensing authorities have ignored the scientific evidence and punished doctors who have dared to share the truth with the world – usually on social media. It is this unscientific bullying, and the widespread publicity given to the consequences, which has contributed to the fact that thousands of doctors who share their doubts and fears have kept quiet – frightened that they too would lose their licences and their livelihoods. A doctor without a licence to practice is as useless as a sweep without his brushes or a taxi driver without a cab. (It is extraordinary, by the way, that the GMC appears to have taken no action whatsoever against doctors who did not care enough about patients but allowed themselves to be bribed to vaccinate with an unnecessary and dangerous drug. Nor has it punished doctors who went on strike, demanding an inflationary 35% pay rise, and abandoned their patients – thereby breaking every moral, ethical and professional commitment.)
I now intend to show exactly why the GMC’s decision to deny Dr Adil his licence was always unjustifiable.
First, there is the question of free speech. Article 19 of the United Nations Charter states clearly that `everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression’. There is no codicil limiting the rights of doctors. The GMC’s decision is in direct opposition to this fundamental human right. It has been argued that doctors have a special responsibility because of their position and training but this strengthens rather than weakens the UN charter. Doctors have a special responsibility to speak out when they believe that something is wrong. And, of course, you can’t have a little bit of free speech any more than a woman can be a bit pregnant. You either have free speech or you don’t. To say that a doctor cannot criticise the medical establishment is as nonsensical as saying that an opposition party politician cannot criticise the government. The licensing authorities which have removed doctors’ licences for speaking out are undeniably in breach of the UN Charter. How a lawyer or a judge can justify allowing any licensing body to deny an individual’s right to protection from the UN Charter is, I confess, a mystery to me. Doctors are entitled to share their views with the public and the public is entitled to decide whom to believe.
It is worth noting, by the way, that right from the start, in early spring of 2020, the doctors supporting the government and drug companies have steadfastly refused to debate in public and the main stream media has taken an entirely biased, unbalanced one sided line in reporting the fake pandemic. The BBC, ignoring its own charter and repeated claims of fairness, has even stated that they would not interview anyone questioning the value of vaccination whether they were `right or wrong’. I have frequently challenged vaccine supporters to a live, national public debate. None have had the confidence or the courage to accept the challenge.
Second, the GMC has assumed that the government and the medical establishment must always be correct and beyond criticism. This is dangerous nonsense. One doesn’t have to go very far back in history to find numerous examples of times when the government and the medical establishment have been completely wrong and, as a result, patients have suffered until doctors had the courage to stand up for the truth. When Dr John Snow gave chloroform to Queen Victoria there was an uproar in the medical establishment because it was felt that women should not be given anaesthesia during childbirth. Electroconvulsive therapy, leucotomies and the removal of vast lengths of the intestine were all approved by the medical establishment but later condemned. It was because of the medical establishment that tonsils were removed without good reason. No one knows how many children died as a result. A good deal of unnecessary heart surgery has been performed on patients because of bad medical practices promoted by the medical establishment. It was because of bad medical practices condoned or encouraged by the medical establishment that millions of patients became hooked on barbiturates and then benzodiazepines. And I wonder how many of those who have condemned Dr Adil know that widely used and previously approved vaccination programmes have been condemned as worthless and dangerous.
History shows that the medical establishment has been wrong more often than it has been right and if the GMC stops doctors criticising the government and the medical establishment (known to be linked to the pharmaceutical industry) then nothing will ever change for the better.
If we go back a little in medical history we come across individuals such as Dr Semmelweiss whose work on women lying in labour wards changed medical practice and saved thousands if not millions of lives. Dr Semmelweiss was, of course, viciously attacked by the medical establishment. There are many more examples in my book `Medical Heretics’. Maybe the lawyers working for the General Medical Council would like to read a copy. It is readily available on Amazon.
The undeniable truth is that history shows that the medical establishment has always suppressed the truth and promoted profitable lies. Nothing has changed. The medical establishment still promotes medical procedures which don’t work, while suppressing essential but inconvenient truths. The GMC’s fundamental mistake appears to me to have been to have assumed that its loyalty should be to the medical establishment rather than to the welfare of patients.
Third, and more directly perhaps, the evidence now shows quite clearly that the medical establishment’s official line on covid-19 was completely false. Everything that the establishment has said and done has been wrong and dangerous. The General Medical Council and all those who supported its decisions seemed to have assumed that the establishment was right.
If they had looked closely at the evidence they would have known that the UK Government’s own scientific advisers decided, back in March 2020, that covid was not a major threat. They would have known that Government statistics show that the number of people who died from covid-19 was no greater than the number who die from flu every year (a disease which had mysteriously and conveniently disappeared). Indeed, the number of deaths from what was clearly a rebranded flu was no greater in 2020 and 2021 than it was in some previous years. Moreover, it is now clear that the absurd policies of lockdowns, social distancing and mask wearing were without any scientific foundation, were unnecessary and dangerous and were in part responsible for the entirely predictable increase in deaths which marked 2022 and will continue for some years to come. The PCR test was never intended to be used as it was, and has been proven, beyond any doubt, to be of no more value than a coin toss. It is clear that the closing down of schools and businesses was also entirely unnecessary and has done massive, long-lasting damage. Worse still, it is now abundantly clear, and generally accepted by intelligent, well-informed doctors and scientists, that the covid-19 vaccine was never properly tested, was never fit for purpose and is the most dangerous and deadly pharmaceutical product ever marketed. Largely because of links with the pharmaceutical companies involved the government and the medical establishment misled the public and the health professions. All the evidence for these claims is available on my website and books and in over 300 videos I have made in the last three years.
Finally, there is one other rather shocking reason why the GMC should not have made any rulings about Dr Adil or any other doctors who criticised the official line on covid-19 and the covid-19 vaccine.
Remarkably, it seems to me that the General Medical Council has itself been behaving quite improperly. Its disciplinary actions must surely now come into question.
The General Medical Council has invested nearly £1,000,000 in fast food and drink firms and, worse still, has invested large amounts of money from doctors’ fees in drug companies. And one of the companies in which it had shares was one of the companies making a covid-19 vaccine.
How can the GMC judge doctors’ behaviour in relation to covid and covid jabs when it has a vested interest in the financial success of vaccine manufacturers such as Astra Zeneca?
It seems to me that it cannot.
I believe that any doctors who have lost their licences for criticising the fake pandemic and the toxic covid jab should be reinstated immediately since the GMC is clearly `contaminated’.
It could surely be argued that the GMC, which has money invested in vaccine manufacture, has a vested interest in protecting vaccine making and should not, therefore, discipline doctors whose actions might have damaged the earning potential of any companies in which it has invested its own money.
The GMC can be compared to a judge punishing someone for criticising a product in which he himself has a financial interest. Indeed, I would argue that the GMC, and its vast army of overpaid, and, it seems to me, sometimes arrogant, pen pushers has abandoned its role as a guardian of the public and become an enforcer for the pharmaceutical industry.
Those doctors, like Dr Adil, who had the wisdom to see that the government and the medical establishment were wrong deserve praise not punishment.
Those who had the courage to speak out should be applauded and it is they, not the promoters of a `vaccine’ that does not do what it was promised to do but which has caused many deaths and much illness, who should be honoured.
In a free and progressive society criticism of the establishment should never be subject to censorship.
My conclusion can only be that the General Medical Council is unfit for purpose and should be closed down immediately. It is not fit to hand out dog licences, and certainly not equipped to control the licensing of doctors. It has failed to do its job: to protect the public and it appears to me to have acted more in the interests of the pharmaceutical industry than the interests of patients.
I hope that readers will send this article to their MP and to the press and to ask why the GMC has been allowed to act against the interests of the public for the last three years. I’m banned from all main stream media and all social media so please put links to this article on Facebook, Twitter and all the rest.
I suspect that other licensing bodies around the world may, on investigation, be shown to have similarly failed their publics and I hope that they too will be investigated.
Passing Observations 187
12TH JULY 2023
Crooks are now able to merge photos of two similar looking people and create one image. Unfortunately, biometric security devices can’t distinguish between the spoofed photo and each of the two individuals. So because they can’t find the ‘person’ whose deep fake image is on a wanted poster (because they don’t exist) the police will arrest the two people whose photos were spoofed. Welcome to the Great Reset and the wonders of digitalisation.
Despite all the fuss about wind farms and solar energy, the consumption of oil rose in 2022 by about 3%. And idiotic protestors interfering with sporting events aren’t going to change that trend any time soon. The really big problem, of course, is that the oil is running out. Read all about it in my book A Bigger Problem than Climate Change. The CIA and controlled opposition dispute this but the acknowledged fact that the oil is running out was, three quarters of a century ago, one of the triggers for the globalists’ depopulation plan.
The market for coal is rising. In 2022, coal prices in Europe averaged £235 a tonne (that is a 145% increase on the previous year). Germany has now closed its nuclear power plants (for absolutely no good reason other than that the silly greenies didn’t like them). Last year a third of the electricity in Germany was produced by coal fired power plants, and the closure of the nuclear power plants means that the consumption of coal to make electricity will be much higher in the next twelve months.
Coal is by far the dominant fuel for power generation in China. And likely to remain so for some time. Burning coal is much better for the planet than burning wood pellets (which is very popular in the UK.)
I foolishly bought insurance to cover our plumbing and drains. When we had a blocked drain I rang for help. They sent a man who was no help whatsoever. He stayed a few minutes and then left. For four days we rang numerous times and were told that help was on the way. It wasn’t. In the end we had to hire a local firm to deal with the problem. The insurers sent us a cheque for £80 in compensation for failing to help. But they refused to pay for the repair because we hadn’t been given permission to get an outside expert. I have cancelled the insurance and learned another lesson.
It is possible for a woman to give birth to twins fathered by two different men. In 1970, in Germany, blood tests led to a court ruling that although a woman had given birth to twins, one of her babies was illegitimate.
Politicians waste 90% of the money they gouge out of taxpayers – doling it out to cronies and crooks. They steal the other 10%. I regard paying tax as paying protection money. If I don’t pay, thugs will come round and break my bones.
Anyone buying biofuel for a car or other machine is condemning someone to death from starvation. Food is for eating, not to be used as a substitute for oil.
In the 15th century all you had to do to destroy someone was to accuse them of being a witch. One accusation would result in certain death. (The accused would, for example, be thrown into a pond. If they lived they were guilty and they were burnt to death. If they drowned they were innocent.) The same system has been revived. Anyone accused of being an anti-vaxxer or a climate change denier is ruined. Anyone accused of sexism or racism is considered guilty until proved innocent. And the power of social media means that they are destroyed even if they can prove themselves innocent.
My bet is that the World Government the conspirators are planning will be centred in Israel. Just a hunch.
Peeping Toms used to be immune from prosecution if they were over 50-years-old or had only one eye.
Doctors’ stethoscopes are often contaminated with dangerous bugs such as staphylococci and can spread infections from one patient to another. Less than 10% of doctors have ever cleaned their stethoscopes. For advice on surviving doctors read my book How to Stop Your Doctor Killing You. It’s banned in China and Germany (for upsetting governments, drug companies and the medical establishment) and heaven knows where else, though I’m delighted to say that there are still versions in Portuguese and Polish.
Elvis Presley used to have a motorised exercise bike. (I suppose the alternative was to buy an ordinary exercise bike and get someone else to ride it for him.)
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, is a member of the Board of Trustees of the World Economic Forum. Hands up anyone who is surprised by this revelation. When she addressed the Davos shindig in 2022, she called for global unity. It is absolutely no surprise that she is apparently Biden’s choice as leader of NATO. We shall then have to address her as Corporal von der Leyen.
Banks in the UK have been told by the Government they must respect the free speech of their customers – and not close their accounts just because they do not have woke views. Banks have also been told that they should stop profiteering by charging 6% or 7% for mortgages and paying 0.1% to savers. It’ll be a surprise if they take any notice.
Snitching is becoming a global pastime. The BBC reports (with glee I suspect) that in 2022, 48,754 sneaks contacted the DVLA with concerns about someone else’s fitness to drive. That figure is up from 26,716 in 2021. Inevitably, most of those complaints concerned older drivers though, as insurance companies will confirm, it is younger drivers who cause most accidents. The medium term plan is clearly to take driving licences away from older drivers (to begin with it will be those over 70, though this age limit will fall rapidly and in a few years those over 40 years of age will have their licences taken away from them). Since there are very few bus services these days, this will force older citizens into tiny flats in tower blocks, just as recommended by the globalists.
Long covid (the fashionable non-existent disease that lasts a lifetime) is now found most commonly among doctors, nurses and hospital staff.
The greatest western movie ever made was Shane with Alan Ladd. I’ve just read, for the first time, Jack Schaefer’s short story on which the film was based. It is a beautifully written story, which transcends an often underestimated genre and is a greater, truer piece of literature than anything which has ever won a literary prize.
The mainstream media claims the world just had its hottest day ever. This absurd claim made my blood boil. (Actually, it’s been so cold recently that I’m thinking of putting the central heating back on. And have you noticed that even if it is pleasantly warm in the daytime it gets very cold at night? That’s a sure sign that they’re fiddling with the weather – which we know they are.)
The US Federal Communications Commission has granted permission for 440,000 5G satellite launches. And that’s just launches from the US. You’d think the damned things would all be bumping into one another, wouldn’t you?
The Lancet and the Drug Industry
12TH JULY 2023
The following article is taken from my book The Dementia Myth:
‘My experience is that issues which are unpopular with the drug companies (the usefulness of vivisection or the questioning of the value and safety of vaccination for example) are ignored by all medical journals.
Medical journalists writing for popular papers often quote articles which have appeared in The Lancet but it is, I think, worth pointing out that The Lancet is a commercial journal which charges a good deal of money for advertising. The latest circulation figures for the weekly magazine show that back in 2007 it sold 29,103 copies and yet despite this relatively modest circulation, a full page advert in The Lancet can cost up to £10,800 (though it will be considerably more than that if you want to buy the back cover). I can only offer the circulation rate for 2007 because, even in 2019, that was the only figure I could find on The Lancet’s website.
Now compare that advertising rate with a magazine that, it is fair to assume, does not take a good deal of drug company advertising. At random I picked a magazine called Model Rail Magazine. It has a circulation of 28,337. And the most expensive page rate for a full page is £900.
So, an advert in The Lancet costs more than ten times as much as an advert in Model Rail Magazine.
And who buys the advertising in The Lancet?
Well, if you guessed that most of it was paid for by drug companies then you probably would not be far off the mark.
And who makes vaccines?
Well, drug companies of course.
Am I being unfair in fearing that there could be a conflict of interest here?
I don’t think so.
I would have more respect for The Lancet (and its point of view) if the magazine refused all drug company advertising and relied entirely on subscription fees. It is worth noting that a subscription to The Lancet costs £163 whereas a subscription to Model Rail Magazine costs £51. Moreover, I doubt if The Lancet pays much if anything to its contributors whereas Model Rail Magazine doubtless has quite a substantial editorial cost.
This astonishing discrepancy in advertising rates is commonplace within the world of medical publishing. There are thousands of medical journals and magazines in existence around the world and many of them are hugely profitable. Drug companies use their journal advertising to promote drugs directly to the doctors with the prescription pads.
The drug companies use charities to indoctrinate patients and they use medical journals to indoctrinate doctors.’
BMA Joins Vernon Coleman in attacking GMC
13TH JULY 2023
My long-running campaign against the General Medical Council (the UK body which gives licences to doctors and then seems to me to take them away if doctors dare to tell the truth or behave ethically) is bearing fruit.
I’m delighted – though slightly startled - to see that the British Medical Association (‘the patients’ enemy’) agrees with my views on the GMC.
The General Medical Council is, in my opinion, useless and dangerous. It needs to be closed down immediately. In my view, the staff sometimes appear rude or uppity, don’t understand the extent and limit of their responsibilities, and don’t seem to realise that their (essentially subservient) role in life is merely to protect patients.
On 25th April 2023, I published an article headed ‘Here’s why cowardly doctors didn’t dare stand up and tell the truth about covid and the jab’.
I explained that the GMC had struck doctors off the register (and removed their licences to practise) if they dared question the official, false claim that the world was threatened with a covid pandemic.
And I explained that this was why so many doctors didn’t dare to speak out and tell the truth about the over-marketed flu bug or expose the dangers of the experimental covid-19 `vaccine’.
The hundreds of officious and expensive administrators at the GMC must bear responsibility for the many death and injuries caused by a vaccine that was never fit for use, that didn’t do what it was supposed to do and which did cause a mass of serious health problems – such as death.
Because of the GMC, doctors were too terrified to speak out against the medical establishment. They saw what had happened to colleagues who dared to share their views with their colleagues and the general public. They say that doctors who dared to speak out had their licences removed by the GMC and were, in addition, vilified by the media.
The truth, so well hidden during the last three years, is that the medical establishment was, as it has been for decades, controlled by the pharmaceutical industry and instead of looking at the facts, licensing authorities around the world merely did as they were told to do.
The tragedy is that numerous doctors lost their licences, and their livelihoods, because they dared to speak out and tell the truth. The majority of doctors, seeing what had happened to those who spoke out, kept quiet and betrayed their patients, themselves and their profession. Those gutless wimps should be ashamed.
Now there are two reasons why truth-tellers can celebrate.
First, I am delighted to report that the BMA’s Annual Representative Meeting has passed a no confidence vote for the GMC and will now call for its leaders to be sacked.
The BMA motion said that `too many’ Medical Practitioners Tribunal Services fitness to practise decisions are `disproportionate to the error of the doctors mistake’ and expressed no confidence in the current tribunal.
Doctors voted for a motion calling for the leadership team of the GMC to be dismissed and replaced with a team that `commands the confidence and support of the medical profession’.
The BMA hasn’t yet quite joined me in calling for the entire GMC to be closed down and replaced. But they’re getting close!
Second, Dr Mohammad Adil, the brave surgeon who was struck off the medical register in the UK for daring to air his opinions about the covid fraud, is now taking the GMC to court. On 19th October 2023 his case will be heard at the Royal Court of Justice in London. Dr Adil had his licence taken from for no good reason three years ago. He has been unable to work for all that time.
His crime? Speaking out.
In the United Kingdom, where doctors are licensed by the General Medical Council, an organisation which is, in theory at least, a charity but which appears to have some of the worst qualities of a quango, a government department and an enforcer for the drug industry. I believe that drug companies control governments, they control the medical establishment and, it appears, they may also control the UK’s medical licensing authority – the General Medical Council.
The GMC has become infamous for its extraordinarily one-sided defence of the exaggerated covid pandemic and the pointless but enormously dangerous covid vaccine.
When the fake pandemic was first promoted with enthusiasm in February and March 2020, I immediately described the covid scare a hoax. The figures available proved without any question that the danger of what was clearly merely a rebranded annual flu had been massively exaggerated by people who had a bad track record at assessing the relevant figures. In the UK, the Government’s own official advisors agreed with me, dismissing the covid-19 infection as being no more dangerous than the annual flu. Their expert advice appears to have been ignored in favour of advice from a mathematician with a terrible track record.
The conspirators behind the exaggerated risk (and I use the word conspirators deliberately) did not like my description of the covid scare as a hoax (a video I made was seen by many millions within days) and I was quickly demonised and lied about in the media. The GMC couldn’t take away my licence because their own administrative rules meant that, as with many doctors, my retirement from active practise meant that I’d had to give up my licence. But younger doctors, those still in practice, were to feel the full wrath of the drug company controlled medical establishment.
So, for example, consider the case of Dr Mohammad Adil who, until three years ago was a respected surgeon working in the NHS. Three years ago Dr Adil criticised the government line on covid, and the GMC responded by taking away his licence – meaning that he could no longer practise as a surgeon or, as a doctor in any capacity.
Today, after three years of unemployment, Dr Adil still doesn’t have his licence. The cost to him has been extraordinary. And we should not forget the cost to the NHS. If we consider that in that three years he could have performed 1,000 operations a year – not an unlikely number – then his three year banishment means that 3,000 patients have been denied the operations they needed.
After several hearings, the GMC has still refused to give Dr Adil back his licence. Dr Adil is not alone. I know of several other doctors in the UK who have had their licences removed for criticising the absurd and indefensible covid policy.
And exactly the same thing has been happening around the world where licensing authorities have ignored the scientific evidence and punished doctors who have dared to share the truth with the world – usually on social media. It is this unscientific bullying, and the widespread publicity given to the consequences, which has contributed to the fact that thousands of doctors who share their doubts and fears have kept quiet – frightened that they too would lose their licences and their livelihoods. A doctor without a licence to practice is as useless as a sweep without his brushes or a taxi driver without a cab. (It is extraordinary, by the way, that the GMC appears to have taken no action whatsoever against doctors who did not care enough about patients but allowed themselves to be bribed to vaccinate with an unnecessary and dangerous drug. Nor has it punished doctors who went on strike, demanding an inflationary 35% pay rise, and abandoned their patients – thereby breaking every moral, ethical and professional commitment.)
I now intend to show exactly why the GMC’s decision to deny Dr Adil his licence was always unjustifiable.
First, there is the question of free speech. Article 19 of the United Nations Charter states clearly that `everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression’. There is no codicil limiting the rights of doctors. The GMC’s decision is in direct opposition to this fundamental human right. It has been argued that doctors have a special responsibility because of their position and training but this strengthens rather than weakens the UN charter. Doctors have a special responsibility to speak out when they believe that something is wrong. And, of course, you can’t have a little bit of free speech any more than a woman can be a bit pregnant. You either have free speech or you don’t. To say that a doctor cannot criticise the medical establishment is as nonsensical as saying that an opposition party politician cannot criticise the government. The licensing authorities which have removed doctors’ licences for speaking out are undeniably in breach of the UN Charter. How a lawyer or a judge can justify allowing any licensing body to deny an individual’s right to protection from the UN Charter is, I confess, a mystery to me. Doctors are entitled to share their views with the public and the public is entitled to decide whom to believe.
It is worth noting, by the way, that right from the start, in early spring of 2020, the doctors supporting the government and drug companies have steadfastly refused to debate in public and the main stream media has taken an entirely biased, unbalanced one sided line in reporting the fake pandemic. The BBC, ignoring its own charter and repeated claims of fairness, has even stated that they would not interview anyone questioning the value of vaccination whether they were `right or wrong’. I have frequently challenged vaccine supporters to a live, national public debate. None have had the confidence or the courage to accept the challenge.
(cont)
Second, the GMC has assumed that the government and the medical establishment must always be correct and beyond criticism. This is dangerous nonsense. One doesn’t have to go very far back in history to find numerous examples of times when the government and the medical establishment have been completely wrong and, as a result, patients have suffered until doctors had the courage to stand up for the truth. When Dr John Snow gave chloroform to Queen Victoria there was an uproar in the medical establishment because it was felt that women should not be given anaesthesia during childbirth. Electroconvulsive therapy, leucotomies and the removal of vast lengths of the intestine were all approved by the medical establishment but later condemned. It was because of the medical establishment that tonsils were removed without good reason. No one knows how many children died as a result. A good deal of unnecessary heart surgery has been performed on patients because of bad medical practices promoted by the medical establishment. It was because of bad medical practices condoned or encouraged by the medical establishment that millions of patients became hooked on barbiturates and then benzodiazepines. And I wonder how many of those who have condemned Dr Adil know that widely used and previously approved vaccination programmes have been condemned as worthless and dangerous.
History shows that the medical establishment has been wrong more often than it has been right and if the GMC stops doctors criticising the government and the medical establishment (known to be linked to the pharmaceutical industry) then nothing will ever change for the better.
If we go back a little in medical history we come across individuals such as Dr Semmelweiss whose work on women lying in labour wards changed medical practice and saved thousands if not millions of lives. Dr Semmelweiss was, of course, viciously attacked by the medical establishment. There are many more examples in my book `Medical Heretics’. Maybe the lawyers working for the General Medical Council would like to read a copy. It is readily available on Amazon.
The undeniable truth is that history shows that the medical establishment has always suppressed the truth and promoted profitable lies. Nothing has changed. The medical establishment still promotes medical procedures which don’t work, while suppressing essential but inconvenient truths. The GMC’s fundamental mistake appears to me to have been to have assumed that its loyalty should be to the medical establishment rather than to the welfare of patients.
Third, and more directly perhaps, the evidence now shows quite clearly that the medical establishment’s official line on covid-19 was completely false. Everything that the establishment has said and done has been wrong and dangerous. The General Medical Council and all those who supported its decisions seemed to have assumed that the establishment was right.
If they had looked closely at the evidence they would have known that the UK Government’s own scientific advisers decided, back in March 2020, that covid was not a major threat. They would have known that Government statistics show that the number of people who died from covid-19 was no greater than the number who die from flu every year (a disease which had mysteriously and conveniently disappeared). Indeed, the number of deaths from what was clearly a rebranded flu was no greater in 2020 and 2021 than it was in some previous years. Moreover, it is now clear that the absurd policies of lockdowns, social distancing and mask wearing were without any scientific foundation, were unnecessary and dangerous and were in part responsible for the entirely predictable increase in deaths which marked 2022 and will continue for some years to come. The PCR test was never intended to be used as it was, and has been proven, beyond any doubt, to be of no more value than a coin toss. It is clear that the closing down of schools and businesses was also entirely unnecessary and has done massive, long-lasting damage. Worse still, it is now abundantly clear, and generally accepted by intelligent, well-informed doctors and scientists, that the covid-19 vaccine was never properly tested, was never fit for purpose and is the most dangerous and deadly pharmaceutical product ever marketed. Largely because of links with the pharmaceutical companies involved the government and the medical establishment misled the public and the health professions. All the evidence for these claims is available on my website and books and in over 300 videos I have made in the last three years.
Finally, there is one other rather shocking reason why the GMC should not have made any rulings about Dr Adil or any other doctors who criticised the official line on covid-19 and the covid-19 vaccine.
Remarkably, it seems to me that the General Medical Council has itself been behaving quite improperly. Its disciplinary actions must surely now come into question.
The General Medical Council has invested nearly £1,000,000 in fast food and drink firms and, worse still, has invested large amounts of money from doctors’ fees in drug companies. And one of the companies in which it had shares was one of the companies making a covid-19 vaccine.
How can the GMC judge doctors’ behaviour in relation to covid and covid jabs when it has a vested interest in the financial success of vaccine manufacturers such as Astra Zeneca?
It seems to me that it cannot.
I believe that any doctors who have lost their licences for criticising the fake pandemic and the toxic covid jab should be reinstated immediately since the GMC is clearly `contaminated’.
It could surely be argued that the GMC, which has money invested in vaccine manufacture, has a vested interest in protecting vaccine making and should not, therefore, discipline doctors whose actions might have damaged the earning potential of any companies in which it has invested its own money.
The GMC can be compared to a judge punishing someone for criticising a product in which he himself has a financial interest. Indeed, I would argue that the GMC, and its vast army of overpaid, and, it seems to me, sometimes arrogant, pen pushers has abandoned its role as a guardian of the public and become an enforcer for the pharmaceutical industry.
Those doctors, like Dr Adil, who had the wisdom to see that the government and the medical establishment were wrong deserve praise not punishment.
Those who had the courage to speak out should be applauded and it is they, not the promoters of a `vaccine’ that does not do what it was promised to do but which has caused many deaths and much illness, who should be honoured.
In a free and progressive society criticism of the establishment should never be subject to censorship.
My conclusion can only be that the General Medical Council is unfit for purpose and should be closed down immediately. It is not fit to hand out dog licences, and certainly not equipped to control the licensing of doctors. It has failed to do its job: to protect the public and it appears to me to have acted more in the interests of the pharmaceutical industry than the interests of patients.
I hope that readers will send this article to their MP and to the press and to ask why the GMC has been allowed to act against the interests of the public for the last three years. I’m banned from all main stream media and all social media so please put links to this article on Facebook, Twitter and all the rest.
I suspect that other licensing bodies around the world may, on investigation, be shown to have similarly failed their publics and I hope that they too will be investigated.
Bank of England needs an enema!
Or two, or three.