Sooner or later that airman has to land and get out of that F-16 to take a shit, and that's where I've got him! They know this to be true, and the smart ones won't participate. The dumb ones, the DEI graduates, well, look out for falling F-16s.
There isn't a gun shop in cook county Illinois! South side of Chicago is a war zone! The gang bangers don't buy their guns from legitimate gun dealers. Twice they broke into a rail car full of guns in the rail yard. Stole hundreds of guns! Had inside knowledge which rail car had guns being shipped from the east coast to the West! Take away all the guns from the citizens and the crooks reign supreme! Locally and in DC! BumbBiden just follows the script he his given. No brain waves!
Info was allowed to leak with or without knowledge. Sometimes on a specific street corner cases of weapons will appear, BATF, CIA, FBI, NSA, or any combination of actors (not necessarily alphabet soup).
One of Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals - Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. They want us to think that they have more power, and we have less power, than is true. I am always reminded of the ruby slippers in The Wizard of Oz.
When the Second Amendment was passed, you were indeed allowed to own a cannon, and many did.
A few thoughts are in order. If you feel like his statement insults your intelligence, it's because it does. I think this is a type of propaganda wherein the perpetrator is in effect falsely stating the beliefs of his opponents. No one in his right mind thinks that an ordinary group of Americans, even if made up of combat arms veterans, formed into a militia that is properly trained, well led and regularly exercised, could win a standup battle against the U.S. military. The propaganda consists of him in effect saying that they do, in fact, believe that they can. Implicit in the president's argument is that the citizenry would engage in pitched battles, though they would not be so foolish.
It’s a type of disparagement. The enlightened of the blue cities have another reason to look down on the poor, benighted rubes and laugh at their simple mindedness. It makes use of people's natural desire to see themselves as among the wisest and most enlightened, a version of the “emperor's new clothes” story. It is most effective on what we might call “level one thinkers,” who do not think ahead or think things through very much. More mature thinkers would think things like, “they are really not less intelligent than we are out in fly-over country, so this is fishy.” They fall for the first rule of propaganda, the rule of simplification - reducing all data to a simple confrontation between 'Good and Bad', 'Friend and Foe'. As people mature they are more likely to think things through, and become less susceptible, they think ahead more and think about consequences.
Consider the statement itself. They presuppose that the military would simply follow orders and fire on civilians, and that they would back the regime. Upon joining the U.S. military one takes an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, (an oath I took myself). A law that is unconstitutional is invalid, and an unconstitutional order is invalid. This has actual legal consequences. How it would play out is uncertain, but it seems unlikely that the military would uniformly follow a government turned totalitarian.
The President's statement about needing F-15's might be intended for his base. A large group of the “elites” have abandoned America in search of greater wealth, sending jobs overseas, bringing in replacement workers from third world countries and creating financial disaster in the heartland. (They were shocked when Trump was elected, the only candidate willing to be on the side of the majority of Americans.) They may well be frightened of the great body of Americans so affected, and actually be fearful of the potential consequences. Telling them that there is nothing to worry about, the rubes don't have F-15s, is a way of showing that they will be protected from their action's consequences.
I've stopped paying attention to the BRAWNDO administration. On the plus side is does make writing comedy much easier. 304 days and counting.
Serious question though. If the bill of rights (I write them in lower case now, since they seem to have lost their position in our society) are written as restrictions on the government's authority, how are they now used as restrictions on the freedoms of the American citizen?
What if the regime were asking "mayors" to restrict and take away a citizen's right to free speech, to peaceably assemble or petition government. What if mayors or governors could ignore, or worse yet, make illegal, a citizen's right to a trial by a jury of his peers, or the right against self incrimination, or the shield against unreasonable searches and seizures. The whole premise that states or local gov'ts can ignore the constitution "because state's rights" is completely up-side-down. Again, the constitution and specifically the bill of rights is a restriction of what the government can do, not the citizen.
This whole notion that the government can pick and choose which part of the constitution it wants to "protect and defend" based on the whims of whatever delusional petty dictator, or closet cabal of middle or far east asian sociopaths is pulling that puppet dictators strings, is both laughable and infuriating.
Popular among 2A supporters is the idea of the four boxes. The idea is that the protections to liberty contained in the Bill of Rights consist of the ballot box, the jury box, the soap box and the cartridge box. Upon inspection one notices that only the last consists of real, physical objects. A tyrannical government may simply do away with voting, corrupt the court system and eliminate freedom of speech. They would no doubt declare the private possession of arms to be illegal, but collecting them would be a monumental task.
Bill Gates now the biggest owner of farmland in the US
Bill Gates, the billionaire founder of Microsoft, has been revealed as the biggest private owner of farmland in the US, after buying up 242,000 acres in 18-states.
Control the food and water, you control the People.
Many of the people reading this post have sons, daughters, spouses, family members that serve this country. Why do you think that the military is behind a treasonous Biden?
It's the military leadership, not the regular military. They are ruining it for those families that required a service commitment from their family members. The damage is cumulative and though we hope it doesn't extend to nuclear war fighting capabilities, in our heart we know it does. The late Peter Pry had much to say on this.
Would you consider an analysis of today, they are killing us and incarcerating us and there is a solution at hand.
Do you writers and readers hope to return to a Constitutional republican form of government or not? Do you acquiesce to evil; do you permit infringements on your unalienable rights granted by God?
Never mind the bullshit!! We have heard it all before, read it, and written it. We are living it and we are doing it to us. Bell curve anyone?” It all plots on the bell curve. 62.5% will not say the truth to the de facto. Yes sir; no sir ! 3 bags full Sir. on the left, 12 to 15% are too stupid to qualify to join the military. 16.25% on the right are smart enough to figure it out but will not take action; 3 to 5% on the left control the stupid et al. evil and those that acquiesce to evil ; On the right 3 to 5% of us will return all of us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. A solution that works is published at www.orsja.org. Very few will go Athens, Tennessee 1946. The de facto yields to the de jure when the fraud of deception is clear. The occupant of the office will take a proper oath to the de jure Constitutions with God included no exceptions.
Mindset!! Nomenclature!! Definitions and the proper source for your definitions!!. Assume the mantel of a man or woman with our progeny. Your provenance, unique on Earth, from the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, read the opening paragraph again When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
(1) dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and
(2) to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
(3) declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 1776; the 1777 Confederation and perpetual Union's articles styled The United States of America's Constitution 1859 prior to 1861. The United States of Washington District of Columbia Inc. is the de facto. We are sovereign (see https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/bouvier/bouvier.htm ) all of us are Sovereign. Only us and kings, other governments. See also de facto and de jure page 416 Black's 6th edition) illegal and illegitimate. They changed the definition in Blacks 11th edition.
So, only you can obtain and hold the mindset, no one can do it for you; we cannot do it alone. Use the proper names for everything and spell it out. Then definitions: Bouvier 1856 is the only Constitutional dictionary. We have Black's 1st edition 1891, 4th, 5th, 6th 1991, 11th current. Words are important, use them correctly, as best as you can.
The solution is written out, read and follow the prompts, no interpretation needed. We have the documents, close enough, we have the dictionaries, good enough, now for the mindset. the initial conversion to implementing your move to the III%. Then the perseverance and determination to see it through www.orsja.org.
Sooner or later that airman has to land and get out of that F-16 to take a shit, and that's where I've got him! They know this to be true, and the smart ones won't participate. The dumb ones, the DEI graduates, well, look out for falling F-16s.
There isn't a gun shop in cook county Illinois! South side of Chicago is a war zone! The gang bangers don't buy their guns from legitimate gun dealers. Twice they broke into a rail car full of guns in the rail yard. Stole hundreds of guns! Had inside knowledge which rail car had guns being shipped from the east coast to the West! Take away all the guns from the citizens and the crooks reign supreme! Locally and in DC! BumbBiden just follows the script he his given. No brain waves!
Info was allowed to leak with or without knowledge. Sometimes on a specific street corner cases of weapons will appear, BATF, CIA, FBI, NSA, or any combination of actors (not necessarily alphabet soup).
One of Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals - Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. They want us to think that they have more power, and we have less power, than is true. I am always reminded of the ruby slippers in The Wizard of Oz.
When the Second Amendment was passed, you were indeed allowed to own a cannon, and many did.
A few thoughts are in order. If you feel like his statement insults your intelligence, it's because it does. I think this is a type of propaganda wherein the perpetrator is in effect falsely stating the beliefs of his opponents. No one in his right mind thinks that an ordinary group of Americans, even if made up of combat arms veterans, formed into a militia that is properly trained, well led and regularly exercised, could win a standup battle against the U.S. military. The propaganda consists of him in effect saying that they do, in fact, believe that they can. Implicit in the president's argument is that the citizenry would engage in pitched battles, though they would not be so foolish.
It’s a type of disparagement. The enlightened of the blue cities have another reason to look down on the poor, benighted rubes and laugh at their simple mindedness. It makes use of people's natural desire to see themselves as among the wisest and most enlightened, a version of the “emperor's new clothes” story. It is most effective on what we might call “level one thinkers,” who do not think ahead or think things through very much. More mature thinkers would think things like, “they are really not less intelligent than we are out in fly-over country, so this is fishy.” They fall for the first rule of propaganda, the rule of simplification - reducing all data to a simple confrontation between 'Good and Bad', 'Friend and Foe'. As people mature they are more likely to think things through, and become less susceptible, they think ahead more and think about consequences.
Consider the statement itself. They presuppose that the military would simply follow orders and fire on civilians, and that they would back the regime. Upon joining the U.S. military one takes an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, (an oath I took myself). A law that is unconstitutional is invalid, and an unconstitutional order is invalid. This has actual legal consequences. How it would play out is uncertain, but it seems unlikely that the military would uniformly follow a government turned totalitarian.
The President's statement about needing F-15's might be intended for his base. A large group of the “elites” have abandoned America in search of greater wealth, sending jobs overseas, bringing in replacement workers from third world countries and creating financial disaster in the heartland. (They were shocked when Trump was elected, the only candidate willing to be on the side of the majority of Americans.) They may well be frightened of the great body of Americans so affected, and actually be fearful of the potential consequences. Telling them that there is nothing to worry about, the rubes don't have F-15s, is a way of showing that they will be protected from their action's consequences.
More thoughts https://drp314.substack.com/p/do-you-need-an-f15
I've stopped paying attention to the BRAWNDO administration. On the plus side is does make writing comedy much easier. 304 days and counting.
Serious question though. If the bill of rights (I write them in lower case now, since they seem to have lost their position in our society) are written as restrictions on the government's authority, how are they now used as restrictions on the freedoms of the American citizen?
What if the regime were asking "mayors" to restrict and take away a citizen's right to free speech, to peaceably assemble or petition government. What if mayors or governors could ignore, or worse yet, make illegal, a citizen's right to a trial by a jury of his peers, or the right against self incrimination, or the shield against unreasonable searches and seizures. The whole premise that states or local gov'ts can ignore the constitution "because state's rights" is completely up-side-down. Again, the constitution and specifically the bill of rights is a restriction of what the government can do, not the citizen.
This whole notion that the government can pick and choose which part of the constitution it wants to "protect and defend" based on the whims of whatever delusional petty dictator, or closet cabal of middle or far east asian sociopaths is pulling that puppet dictators strings, is both laughable and infuriating.
Popular among 2A supporters is the idea of the four boxes. The idea is that the protections to liberty contained in the Bill of Rights consist of the ballot box, the jury box, the soap box and the cartridge box. Upon inspection one notices that only the last consists of real, physical objects. A tyrannical government may simply do away with voting, corrupt the court system and eliminate freedom of speech. They would no doubt declare the private possession of arms to be illegal, but collecting them would be a monumental task.
More thoughts https://drp314.substack.com/p/some-second-amendment-thoughts
Bill Gates now the biggest owner of farmland in the US
Bill Gates, the billionaire founder of Microsoft, has been revealed as the biggest private owner of farmland in the US, after buying up 242,000 acres in 18-states.
Control the food and water, you control the People.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9152789/Bill-Gates-biggest-owner-FARMLAND-buying-242-000-acres.html
Many of the people reading this post have sons, daughters, spouses, family members that serve this country. Why do you think that the military is behind a treasonous Biden?
It's the military leadership, not the regular military. They are ruining it for those families that required a service commitment from their family members. The damage is cumulative and though we hope it doesn't extend to nuclear war fighting capabilities, in our heart we know it does. The late Peter Pry had much to say on this.
FJB and comrade Harris.
Only half work at any given time. Where are they going to get parts from China?
They probably will and do!
Infuriating, but, hey it's Chinese Communists.
Would you consider an analysis of today, they are killing us and incarcerating us and there is a solution at hand.
Do you writers and readers hope to return to a Constitutional republican form of government or not? Do you acquiesce to evil; do you permit infringements on your unalienable rights granted by God?
Never mind the bullshit!! We have heard it all before, read it, and written it. We are living it and we are doing it to us. Bell curve anyone?” It all plots on the bell curve. 62.5% will not say the truth to the de facto. Yes sir; no sir ! 3 bags full Sir. on the left, 12 to 15% are too stupid to qualify to join the military. 16.25% on the right are smart enough to figure it out but will not take action; 3 to 5% on the left control the stupid et al. evil and those that acquiesce to evil ; On the right 3 to 5% of us will return all of us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. A solution that works is published at www.orsja.org. Very few will go Athens, Tennessee 1946. The de facto yields to the de jure when the fraud of deception is clear. The occupant of the office will take a proper oath to the de jure Constitutions with God included no exceptions.
Mindset!! Nomenclature!! Definitions and the proper source for your definitions!!. Assume the mantel of a man or woman with our progeny. Your provenance, unique on Earth, from the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, read the opening paragraph again When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
(1) dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and
(2) to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
(3) declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 1776; the 1777 Confederation and perpetual Union's articles styled The United States of America's Constitution 1859 prior to 1861. The United States of Washington District of Columbia Inc. is the de facto. We are sovereign (see https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/bouvier/bouvier.htm ) all of us are Sovereign. Only us and kings, other governments. See also de facto and de jure page 416 Black's 6th edition) illegal and illegitimate. They changed the definition in Blacks 11th edition.
So, only you can obtain and hold the mindset, no one can do it for you; we cannot do it alone. Use the proper names for everything and spell it out. Then definitions: Bouvier 1856 is the only Constitutional dictionary. We have Black's 1st edition 1891, 4th, 5th, 6th 1991, 11th current. Words are important, use them correctly, as best as you can.
The solution is written out, read and follow the prompts, no interpretation needed. We have the documents, close enough, we have the dictionaries, good enough, now for the mindset. the initial conversion to implementing your move to the III%. Then the perseverance and determination to see it through www.orsja.org.