27 Comments
User's avatar
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

I’ll say it again! We will not cure cancer unless we eliminate the real causes of cancer which are toxins from our lifestyle that interfere with normal cellular reproduction that reprogram cell reproduction in abnormal ways! Compounding, this is the degradation of the immune system by lack of key components and the impact of various toxins directly on the immune system. A complex biological dilemma. The mRNA injections are a toxin that produces turbo cancer and must be eliminated and not embraced! If the deranged medicine man would admit this, then maybe it would be solvable, but there is no money to be made by going down the right road! Criminal in my view! Also speaks volumes why they don’t want RFK Jr confirmed!

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

I agree with you to some extent and yes there are numerous toxins. However, I've known a great number of people who have used natural, healthy treatments who have overcome cancer. One friend I knew had a grapefruit-sized tumor in her colon that showed up in an x-ray. Her daughter did some research and found that an herbal mix of 4 herbs, called essiac, would cure many cancers so had her mom try it. One month later, another x-ray showed the tumor was entirely gone, not one trace of it. She did however die due to 3 trials of chemo. Another friend I knew had breast cancer and used baking soda every day, which killed cancer cells. A number of people are now coming forward and saying either they or their relatives/friends have cured even stage 4 cancer with fenbendazole and ivermectin taken together. The brilliant scientist Linus Pauling back in early 1960s told us that 10,000 mg of vitamin C per day would cure cancer and keep it away. He himself took that dosage of vitamin C and lived to be 93 yrs. old. That info was buried though until very recently when I read that it "showed promise in fighting cancer." Makes sense as C strengthens immune system. I still think, though, that we need to clean up all the numerous toxins all around us and which we consumer in our food, beverages etc. that is harming us HUGELY imo. I also agree with you about mRNA jabs. My husband is a virologist/immunologist of 50 yrs, used to work for years in Public Health Dept of PA advising the public/doctors/govt how to handle epidemics. He also used to help develop jabs in 1970s - until he found out what was in them which was cancer cells and mercury - both of which are very bad for us no matter how small the dosage. Govt has been pushing jabs for decades and there are cancer cells in all jabs and since they have been pushing these jabs cancer rates have gone off the charts. I'm 70 y.o. and remember as a kid, NO CHILD WAS EVER VAXED until at least age 6. I've only had 5 jabs in my entire life and am still healthy. These jabs are ruining our kids IMO with all their toxic ingredients. Toxins/jabs need to go!

Expand full comment
ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

That much C would drive my BS to high. 1,000 does. And the 2 key words on jabs was SCHOOL-FREE. Then Ins. or Medicaid took over. I had a mild case of chickenpox as a pre-teen, in my 50's had 2 silver $$ spots of Shingles. Never will take there jab.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Don’t disagree there are positive aspects of consuming immune system boosting natural products and etc. I can recite positive events from rejecting the allopathic medicine model in relationship to cancers.

Expand full comment
JS's avatar

There is a dichotomy of thought here, some of it tending toward militant. There is a middle ground I think, and it might not be exactly in the middle. Some people gonna get cancer no matter what they do. There is a very small number of people who actually lower their risk of lung cancer by smoking more, but you won't know it's you unless you smoke two plus packs a day and see if you can live to ninety years, so I don't recommend it. Otherwise, living better is probably the best you can do to remain cancer free, and intelligent use of allopathic and naturopathic medicine is also probably the best route. But that takes effort. You can do just as much damage to yourself with self-prescribed supplements. Allopathic medicine is always a trade-off, and you need to wisely decide whether what ails you can be lived with or whether you need a therapeutic which always brings a set of consequences. It all goes back to personal responsibility and recognition that life is not supposed to be pain-free and easy, and that we don't live forever. Some things are worse than death.

We here were all born into this world in its current state. We had no choice in the matter. We don't have an opportunity to live free of PCBs, BPs, microplastics, glyphosate, electromagnetic fields, oncogenic viruses, food dyes, chemtrails, if those are your thing, AI and progress toward a new world order. Nothing we can do about any of those things now, and Donald Trump is not going to fix that, and neither are any of us here. Best we can do is just talk about it in places like this and not spend every living day angry and bitter.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Disagree! We need to eliminate the chemicals that destroy bodily functions! Over 50% of US population has been diagnosed with inflammatory diseases. The healthiest our nation was after World War II because we ate organically and had victory Gardens, and we didn’t have the disease states we have today!

Expand full comment
JS's avatar

It's a nice concept, but there is no realistic pathway toward becoming an agrarian society using sustainable agricultural methods at this point in our history. I have known families who homestead. It's a full time job that takes a lifetime of learned skills.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Then there are those who are scaling up organic farming.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

Exactly - precisely - correct!

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

Agreed! Too simple...no money to be made by the Cancer Industry, which thrives by keeping people ignorant of the causes of cancer...and truly all DIS-EASES! People create their own problems and no doctor has the knowledge to solve your individual problems. Doctors can't live with you 24/7 and observe what you are doing wrong. If people want to get rid of cancer or prevent it...DIY. make sure you are not giving it fuel, which will trigger off a growth by feeding it. I got rid of tumors twice, back in 1976 and in 1988 by simply depriving them of the fuel that they needed in order to grow. NOTHING GROWS WITHOUT A FUEL! After I eliminated specific foods...they never reoccured .Charlatans use big words and talk above your head in order to 'snow' you. They want to appear all-knowing. Billions have been spent looking for cures for diseases, such as, cancer with no results. However, truth is very simple and results prove it works!

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Cancer causes are varied. The government has incorporated various chemicals into all our everyday lives. Food, air, clothes, water, soil etc etc. Also vaccines. SV40 was in polio vaccines. Read Dr Mary's Monkey watch The Truth About Cancer and The Truth About Vaccines series..as well as read the books by the drs in them. Rumor has it that Northwestern U discovered using electric currencies could/would eradicate cancer. They were told if the published info they would have no more funding. Other drs have used electric currencies to cure a multitude of issues.

Expand full comment
Guido's avatar

Very timely post.

I've stated for a while that President Trump's cheerleading of the vaxx assassinations was going to have ramifications post-election, and here's a taste. This shite is raw feckin' evil.

If these proposed "intelligence centers" incorporate EMP "hardening" to make them resistant, then it's on. EMP's are the only antidote to this anti-humanism excrement, and if they have pre-emptively designed EMP defense into it, they acknowledge it will be widely opposed and there will be those attempting to eradicate it.

I say dump this shite before it gets off the ground. Call the President out on this boondoggle. Even Elon has voiced concerns (Mr. Neuro-Link himself...)

Onward, Christian soldiers!

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

Kenn, thank you for the restack, I appreciate it very much.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

Thanks for the restack, Abgail, it is appreciated.

Expand full comment
ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

I don't trust A1 for more than making a meme. QR's can contain viruses.

And fixing our health means making better decisions on what we eat. Demanding the 10 grocery chains be broken up under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

Also fixing our medical care which is crappy.

6 months ago a friend, a lady about my age 76, had delayed gallbladder surgery TO REMOVE OLD STONES, It was botched and ruptured into the abdomen, NFECTION STARTED. She is a Type 2 on insulin. She has been in the hospital most of the time. Kidneys damaged, by to low potassium, Dr caused, and constant antibiotics/steroids. Every 2 days Dialysis. Lung infections and trach tube scarred throat, which had to be repaired, another infection. Wrong meds, Dr refused to consider that gut flora was damaged. Nearly died several times. NO oxygen at home. Lungs are 'sticky' and fill with fluid from the lung infections. Thursday she stopped breathing. Sepsis. No way to do CPR because of lung damage. No other way to restore breathing. Sister did a Breathing procedure for her. EMT's called. More antibiotics. Had her on Morphine which suppresses breathing. Family said NO. Moving to a chest Lidocaine patch. Need a Med. Malpractice lawyer who is not an ambulance chaser for Shelby Co, TN. The family kept a big stack of records documenting all that has happened. SHEER INCOMPENTENCE.

Expand full comment
ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

Trump to sign executive order targeting gain-of-function research: Report https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/trump-executive-order-gain-of-function-virus-research-pause-covid-19-125012300546_1.html The Trump administration is preparing an executive order that would stop federal funding for gain-of-function (GOF) research, The Wall Street Journal reports . Gain-of-function is a controversial area of virus-related research that has been widely debated since the COVID-19 pandemic. The research modifies a virus to increase its transmissibility, virulence or ability to evade the immune system. Essentially, it makes the virus more dangerous and deadly than its natural state. Scientists in favor of GOF research argue that it can provide crucial insights into how viruses evolve and spread.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Posted a link to this article and the image about a conspiracy believing friend saving their friends lives.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Posting this on Facebook is the only way I can get the word out.

Expand full comment
sadie's avatar

Ellison is a nut job... pure narcissist. What he talked about already exists... called gene therapy in biotech field, using CRISPR... hasn't worked long term because what they target also exists in healthy cells.... said blood test already exists... I think he was just throwing that out there because of his pharma handlers/buddies. Watch it, but his surveillance crap is more worrisome.

Expand full comment
kitten seeking answers's avatar

Ronald Regan was called the “Teflon President” because criticism and blame never stuck to him (vaccine manufacturer “immunity” from liability was his enduring legacy.)

Is Trump “Teflon 2.0,” held blameless for Warp Speed and now “Stargate”… no wonder he didn’t denounce the “beautiful vaccines” on the campaign trail. the fake cancer vaccines are the sales pitch to get the massive surveillance data centers built and Trump knows it.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

Maybe, maybe not, the answer may be a lot more complicated than we see.

Expand full comment
FreedomFighter's avatar

There is, in spite of the evil today, a certain order of the universe. First, is God. Under God, Mother Nature. Messing with God or Mother Nature means doom for those whose egos are bigger than their gray matter. If you think that "artificial intelligence" (how can artificial be intelligent?) is the answer to health matters or much else, you are being deceived. A computer derived "solution" of fed information-- truth, fiction, subjective experiences-- is computer logic. It is not the be all, end all truth-- just a binary mathematical computation. Be careful where you place your trust. Haven't we learned anything from the past 4-5 years?

Expand full comment
JS's avatar

We already identify some of those with incipient cancer. BRCA and Lynch Syndrome off the top of my head. We do prophylactic mastectomies, hysterectomies and salpingo-oopherectomies to prevent cancer in BRCA women. These women have a very high probability of developing cancer in those organs, and most of them have mothers, grandmothers, aunts and sisters who have already had cancer. While not treated systemically for cancer that is not yet diagnosed, they get enrolled into more intensive, highly lucrative screening programs. And breast cancer, as is all women's healthcare is already highly politicized and lucrative. In a non-insane world, if I had no cynical bones in my body where things were as you saw them, I would say those people need to be in intensive screening programs, but I know how things are. There is some moderate solution that we are never going to achieve.

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

I wish everyone would read this Edwin. Sam Altman is frightening as well… 🤬

Expand full comment
Renee Marie's avatar

Unfortunately, cognitive dissonance prevails. Even those people that question everything, don’t question evil that is right in front of them. Amazing…

This is critical thinking 101…with a little Intuition thrown in.

This is my humble take.

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

If what you said about white slavers being dead in a month, if they attempted capture, from the diseases they had no immunity for is true. then why didn't all the people who sailed the ships across the Atlantic filled with slaves or the owners of slaves in America also die or at least catch those same diseases?

If this were true it would likely have ended slavery in America long before Lincoln did.

You are writing some good stuff, but I stopped at this because it makes no sense and ruins credibility for the rest.

I want your message to be heard and not discredited over a side issue. That's why I'm bothering to say this.

Expand full comment