All this is rather odd since the EU has decided that nuclear energy should be considered green and sustainable (even though it relies on uranium which has to be dug out of the ground).
Technically, uranium is a dust that can be blown out of mines. Or at least there's a dust isotope.
If you wanted a 100% safe nuclear reactor, you could build a boron reactor, and it won't blow up, scram, or pollute the environment. There is also talk of a salt reactor. Nothing says you have to have uranium to provide power.
Yeah, the greenie's are morons. If they were really worried about carbon, they'd 100% support nuclear reactors.
Back in the 50's there were two competing nuclear technologies. There were the uranium reactors and there were the thorium reactors. We went elbow deep on uranium reactors due to the business people's greed. They could make massive reactors in the multiple GW capacity. The downside was the waste that has to be stored for hundreds to millions of years. On the other hand, Thorium reactors generated little toxic waste, less power but they were essentially clean. We need to get back to thorium. Trust me.
All this is rather odd since the EU has decided that nuclear energy should be considered green and sustainable (even though it relies on uranium which has to be dug out of the ground).
Technically, uranium is a dust that can be blown out of mines. Or at least there's a dust isotope.
If you wanted a 100% safe nuclear reactor, you could build a boron reactor, and it won't blow up, scram, or pollute the environment. There is also talk of a salt reactor. Nothing says you have to have uranium to provide power.
Yeah, the greenie's are morons. If they were really worried about carbon, they'd 100% support nuclear reactors.
It proves they're only interested in cutting power use among western companies and populations, and no, they're not morons, but Communists.
Back in the 50's there were two competing nuclear technologies. There were the uranium reactors and there were the thorium reactors. We went elbow deep on uranium reactors due to the business people's greed. They could make massive reactors in the multiple GW capacity. The downside was the waste that has to be stored for hundreds to millions of years. On the other hand, Thorium reactors generated little toxic waste, less power but they were essentially clean. We need to get back to thorium. Trust me.
Climate change is the march of Marxism.
nice share Edwin
Thanks.
for sure Edwin
wrong.
He is very logical, isn't he.
👍🏼