I haven't been invited (or allowed) to discuss vaccination on the radio or television for many years. This is largely because the medical establishment (having lost a long series of debates) will no longer agree to debate any medical topic with me or, indeed, to appear on any programme which has invited me to be a participant. For decades now I have been regularly lied about by people who have been frustrated by their inability to find errors in the claims I’ve made on a variety of health topics – including vaccination.
An awful lot of outrageous untruths have been told about me by various representatives of the medical establishment and the media and by individuals who are either drug company shills or who are determined to believe that vaccines are safe and effective, whatever the evidence might show.
Twelve years ago I was, to my immense surprise, invited to discuss vaccination on a late evening programme on Radio City, an independent station in Liverpool. A local doctor was invited to debate with me. The result was extraordinary.
For quite a while the doctor refused to admit that doctors make any money out of giving vaccines. Until I pressed him directly he indignantly denied that doctors have a financial interest in promoting vaccination. Only when I pointed out that GPs receive fees and bonuses for vaccinating their patients did he, rather reluctantly, agree that I was right. The doctor's main defence seemed to me to be that because the Government and other doctors agreed with his views on vaccination (which were, naturally, diametrically opposed to mine) then he must be right and I must be wrong. I have never found this a very convincing argument and nor, I felt, did the listeners. The presenter wanted to know why the facts I was giving had never been aired before.
At the end of the programme I was told that the programme had never before had such a response from listeners. It was, I was assured, their biggest ever audience response. Listeners were desperate for more information. Many were astounded at the evidence I produced. Some accused me of scaremongering for questioning pro-vaccination propaganda and for pointing out that doctors get paid for giving vaccinations. At the end of the programme I was asked if I would make another, longer programme on the subject of vaccination. I said I would. I offered to debate the subject of vaccination with any number of pro-vaccination doctors and experts the radio station could find.
I was not, however, surprised when I never heard from them again. I contacted them to ask if they were still interested in another more intensive debate. They weren't. And since then no other radio station has been prepared to allow me to discuss vaccination on air. I doubt if this will change. Patients, like doctors, will be protected from the inconvenient truths.
The media in general is constantly full of articles and programmes sneering at those who worry about vaccination and promoting vaccination as safe and effective.
Here's an extract from a pro-vaccination article by a columnist in Time magazine: ‘I'm pretty confident in the way I get my knowledge. Even in the age of Google and Wikipedia we still receive almost all our information from our peers. When presented with doubts, I don't search for detailed information from my side. I go with the consensus of mainstream media, academia and the Government. Not because they are always right but because they're right far more often than not, and I have a TiVo to watch. Also, unlike anti-vaccination people, they usually shut up after a little while.'
I could hardly believe that when I first read it and I can hardly believe it now that I've re-read it. But the truth is that most people now think like this and so the bad guys get away with their lies and their deceits and their manipulations and their spin. The drug companies are extremely powerful and effective at persuading journalists. They have bought most of the doctors and most of the medical journals and so they can be very convincing. Sometimes the pro-vaccine journalists become quite absurdly overblown in their support for vaccination. In December 2009, a magazine called Wired even claimed it was a ‘fact' that: ‘By any measure of scientific consensus, there is total agreement: vaccines are safe, effective and necessary.' And it's a fact that the moon is made of green cheese. Facts? Who needs the real thing when you can just make them up when you need them.
Most doctors are unquestioning - too frightened to upset the establishment. Asking uncomfortable questions can ruin a doctor's career. And medical journalists are just as useless. Most have very little formal medical training, they don't know what to look for, they not infrequently receive payments from drug companies (the payments are offered for articles written for drug company publications and are frequently far in excess of the sort of payments that the journalists would normally expect to receive) and they hardly ever have the courage to take on the establishment.
Far too many so-called medical and health journalists are wimpy incompetents who won't print or broadcast anything which might damage their cosy relationships with the medical establishment and the international pharmaceutical industry.
The power of the pro-vaccination lobby is powerful and far spread. When I wrote a short-lived column for the Oriental Morning Post in China the editors were at first reluctant to publish a column I had written criticising vaccination. Eventually, the editors printed the piece (simply because I refused to provide an alternative). After the column appeared, my book publishers in China wrote to tell me that the Chinese Government had informed them that they could no longer publish my books. My publishers in China had produced four of my books, all of which had sold very well, but they had been told by the Government that only `medical publishing houses' could in future publish books concerned with health care. Other Chinese publishers who had shown great enthusiasm for publishing my books suddenly changed their minds.
I am sometimes told that, as a critic of vaccination, it is my job to prove that vaccines are dangerous and that I should stop criticising vaccination until I have evidence proving that vaccines can be dangerous and are often ineffective. That is a nonsense. It is the responsibility of those who are making, endorsing and giving vaccines to be sure that they are safe. The drug companies have a responsibility to prove that their products are safe and effective. Unfortunately, it is common these days for Governments to allow industries to do things without proving that they are safe, and to then expect opponents to prove that something is unsafe. The fact is, of course, that it is impossible to produce evidence proving that a procedure doesn't do something. The onus should, of course, be on those who promote these procedures to produce evidence proving that they are safe. It is not possible to prove a negative.
In a logical, sensible, scientific world it is the job of those who promote vaccination to prove that the procedure is safe and effective in general, and that individual vaccines are safe and effective in use.
Sadly, that isn't going to happen.
And today no mainstream media organisation anywhere in the world will allow criticism of vaccination. They must know that vaccines are often dangerous and frequently don’t work. They must know that vaccines frequently do more harm than good. But they are paid to lie and too cowardly to debate the evidence.
Doctor Vernon Coleman July 1981
Adapted from Vernon Coleman’s book Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying: Here’s the proof. The book is available as a paperback and an eBook on Amazon.
The Fake Long Covid Plague – Another useful confidence trick
21ST OCTOBER 2022
The biggest and most significant research into long covid, involving 26,000 individuals, concluded that long covid is largely a psychological problem.
In America there are 12 million people off work with this imaginary disorder. In the UK there are two million long covid sufferers signed off sick – unable to work.
The truth is that people who had taken a year off work on full pay didn’t want to go back to their offices.
The evidence shows that long covid is a combination of hypochondria and malingering.
It’s the beginning of the universal basic income – a critical part of the Great Reset now being trialled in Wales and Ireland.
There was never a global covid pandemic but now we have a global long covid pandemic.
So, why have they created this fake disease - ‘long covid’?
First, governments have welcomed the growth in the number of alleged covid sufferers because it helps make people afraid of the rebranded flu – and accept the jabs which are dishonestly promoted as preventing it.
Second, governments know that if a huge chunk of the workforce stays at home the disruption and the cost will severely damage the economy.
Third, and this is crucial, the false long covid disease is an excellent cover for the injuries caused by the covid-19 jabs.
Fourth, long covid is keeping NHS staff at home and causing NHS waiting lists to soar still higher – all part of the deliberate plan to wreck health care.
Fifth, if people weren’t off sick with alleged long covid the unemployment figures would be much higher. And that would be another embarrassment for beleaguered Governments.
A list of the commonest side effects associated with the covid-19 jabs just happens to be the same as the commonest symptoms associated with ‘long covid’.
Naturally, anyone who dares to look at the evidence – and question the long covid myth – is dismissed as a conspiracy theorist and banned from sharing their views.
As usual, there is no debate in the mainstream media where journalists are terrified of the truth and have to cover their eyes if a fact threatens their daily deceit.
Vernon Coleman’s book Endgame (available in hardcover and as a paperback and an eBook on Amazon) explains what is going on – and what the conspirators really want.
One jab to stop you getting flu and the other to stop you getting the other flu
21ST OCTOBER 2022. Dr. Coleman
Doctors are pushing two jabs this autumn. One is, allegedly, to stop you getting the flu. And the other is, allegedly, to stop you getting the other flu – the over-marketed one known as covid-19.
How much research has been done, you might ask yourself, to find out if having two jabs together is completely safe.
But it would be a silly question because neither drug companies nor doctors do boring research like that. It might produce inconvenient results.
Indeed, they don’t do much research at all. They just sort of ‘know’ that their products are wonderful, safe and effective. (Actually, the only thing they know for sure is that the damned things are immensely profitable. The EU is reported to have overpaid £32 billion for some vaccines and no one noticed. I understand. That’s always happening to me.)
Once you’re in your 60s, you will suddenly find yourself enormously popular with your doctor.
He or she won’t want to visit you at home, of course. If you want to be ill, you will probably have to make an appointment for three weeks ahead and then make do with a wet-behind-the-ears junior trainee or the practice nurse. Or, more likely, a telephone interview with a health care assistant who has O level woodwork and a diploma in advanced car parking.
The GP with whom you are registered will be far too busy counting her money to see you.
But you will receive regular letters inviting you to visit the surgery to be vaccinated. Sometimes it will be the flu vaccine. Sometimes it will be something else. But the chances are that once you reach a certain age then the vaccination offers will come pretty thick and fast. The shingles vaccine is quite profitable. Sorry, I mean popular.
Do not however assume that this is a consequence of any genuine concern for your wellbeing. Your doctor wants to vaccinate you (or, more accurately, to tell his practice nurse to vaccinate you) because he is paid vast amounts of money to vaccinate everyone who’ll keep still long enough to be jabbed.
Doctors have been bought lock, stock and syringe barrel.
Drug companies make huge amounts of money out of selling vaccines. And the establishment has fiddled the evidence, and denied or suppressed the inconvenient truths, in order to promote the official point of view. In Britain, I have been banned from speaking to doctors (or just about anyone else) on this subject. Debates about vaccination are unknown because the pro-vaxers know they’ll lose if they try to defend their bizarre point of view. Those who promote vaccines often claim that vaccination programmes have reduced illness, prevented millions of deaths and are the main reason why the average life expectation has risen.
These are all barefaced lies.
The whole vaccination story is one of the great modern scandals of our time. The entire medical profession has been bribed by the drug industry, working through the Government and using taxpayers’ money.
Most doctors, whether working as hospital consultants, GPs or public health officials, know very little about vaccination. The majority simply follow the establishment line, never question what they are told by the drug industry and dismiss all critics of vaccination as dangerous lunatics.
And doctors know nothing about the dangers of the damned vaccines they so happily jab into patients’ arms. Question the whole damned sordid business and these ill-educated propagandists (who know nothing about the risks of the toxic mixtures they are promoting) will throw up their hands in horror. Ask them for some evidence that vaccines are safe and effective and they become hysterical.
If a doctor wants to vaccinate you then insist that he confirms in writing that the vaccine he recommends is both entirely safe and absolutely essential. You may notice his enthusiasm for the vaccine suddenly diminish.
Taken from The Kick-Ass A-Z for Over 60s by Vernon Coleman. (available as a paperback and an eBook.)