The Ship, With Multiple Backups, Never Should Have Lost Steering
April 1, 2024 by Grant Stinchfield
It turns out the cargo ship that crashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, causing it’s collapse, not only had multiple backup power systems, but it had multiple steering systems as well. Both Federal and International maritime standards call for these auxiliary systems.
They also need to be completely separated from each other so power and steering are never lost.When you break down the factors surrounding this crash, it becomes more and more suspicious. Investigators originally lied about wind speed on the water that day. It turns out there was very little wind that would have had zero effect on turning the ship towards the main pillar of the bridge.
The New Federal State of China, the organization aimed at taking down the Chinese Communist Party, insists the CCP used something called “Remote Towing Technology” to hijack the ship. Whistleblowers inside the CCP believe the crash was a deliberate terrorist attack carried out by Chinese hackers.
https://rumble.com/v4muvyq-the-ship-with-multiple-backups-never-should-have-lost-steering.html
The steering and power outages imo should be highly suspect to the most lame thinker amongst us, lol. No control but a mean veer to the left was doable.
Now about the tiny "explosions' flaming out and the puffs of smoke in succession as the bridge collapsed. Chalk that up to electrical breakage? Hollywood thrill?
Would the entire bridge actually topple from the single hit on the one end? Certainly it would no longer be safe, but in the river? Idk
One of the three letter agencies