Most MDs would not accept chemo for themselves or for their family members. I think that some types of chemo are so toxic that they would finish off healthy people, too. Chemo has acquired such a bad name that the term "immunotherapy" has caught on to replace its name.
Coleman is highly respectable, and provides little-known details, but his account is incomplete (not that anything is perfect). He doesn't mention that diagnostics itself is a joke, no matter what the illness is:
Breast cancer is often caused by mammograms crushing a cyst where the body isolated cancerous cells. The radiation and the pressure don't do much good, either, and about half of the results are false positives or negatives:
Thanks so much for this. I knew there was a lot of bogus info given to women about DCIS, but I didn't realize how bad the data was for chemo for other forms of cancer. Before our screening tech got so advanced it could probably see the interior of an electron, DCIS was almost always an incidental finding at death. Most aggressive breast cancers hit women younger than the women getting DCIS diagnosis. The survival rates for the aggressive breast cancers haven't been getting better. But lumping in the DCIS patients (absent treatment, the 10 year survival rate is 99%) sure pumps up the "breast cancer survival rates."
Another important thing the Breast Cancer Industrial Complex wants us to ignore is that, while the vast numbers of women screened have no symptoms, that doesn't mean breast cancer has no symptoms. Breast cancer can cause changes to the size and shape of the breast, the texture of the skin, shape of the nipple, and can feel hot to the touch. But the mythology is that if you can find the cancer before there are symptoms, the cancer can be crushed before it spreads. Data does not show this.
Here's where the DCIS situation gets even worse. Mammogram machines, seeking ever smaller resolution are squeezing harder than they used to. DCIS is often encapsulated, which might explain why it's described as indolent and rarely spreading. But mammogram machines these days squeeze hard enough to rupture the capsule, so these otherwise slow growing cells are pushed into nutrient rich, highly vascular tissue. Metastasis that might not otherwise happen could be the result.
One also has to ask themselves. Is it really cancer cells they are seeing or diagnosing or are you just another statistic to increase the % of so called chemo cured people. I know of some who literally had no cancer but were put on chemo on the premise that whatever they had going on at the time would, could or might turn into cancer. This is how they also make money and increase the so called success rate. Look into fenbendazole (I don't like pharma but for some they may choose this path and it's working presently) or the likes of apricot kernels ie laetril Vitamin B17.
One must understand the scam of HIV aids, then they will understand that their also playing the same game with cancer in many instances. By now most who read these kinds of posts should understand that their PCR test and many others like it are simply smoke and mirrors where they can manipulate the data to get the result they want. Also look at SV40, Dr Mary's Monkey, also look at this video to see and understand more on how they set out to make cancer more lethal, this is a must watch. https://rumble.com/v3nc2wm-kill-shot-the-cias-sv40-simian-virus-cancer-weapon.html
Immunotherapy is the latest scam word it is chemotherapy. Another is Immuno suppressant drugs although one has to dig a little more, they don't like using this one because people are catching on. Anything to flat line your immune system and create more disease, they have the whole thing backwards. I can see with time the whole immune anything will become a thing of the past, they will even say that we don't have such a thing and that it is hocus pocus. They will say it's all genetic, they have been starting on that one too. Oh you will get cancer etc because well your sister, auntie etc got it. They will never look and see that those who didn't get such things were never injected with so called immunization. Also notice the immunization descriptor attached to injections has been waning and they are calling such vaccination, shots and injections. It's a sign of the times, as the public catches on they change the goal posts for the few who maybe awakening or doubting the pharma cartel/mafia and their peddlers of their wares.
Any so called immunization they want an immune response, they are slamming the body with foreign substances so that the immune system goes crazy, the more crazy the response the better for these people. Oh they try to find the balance where they don't kill the person outright, that's not good for future business or if it happens they hide it. If your body goes crazy or there is an immune response then they say it's working and it's good.
Imagine being told we are going to give you this and you may end up with fever, rashes or mild headache. It's a bit like self flagellation for the entertainment of the medical industry. Really what person in their right mind would have something injected and their body to rejects it, they get really sick and then say it's good. Utter madness.
SO hugely grateful for reading this article at this moment.
My husband was just diagnosed with metastasized throat cancer last week ( non smoker, light drinker, un jabbed) and we are reading chemo is the first thing standard care uses to treat this.
We’ve already ordered a slew of off label meds with the idea of following a version of William Makis, Joe Tippens, Merik/Hope protocols. And now knowing these facts now about chemo, it makes this alternative path much more confidence-inducing!!🙏
After the scamdemic, it takes SO much discernment to know who to trust. If anyone has dirt to share on any of these Dr’s names mentioned above, please share!
Thanks for the restack, Alex, Noneof, EnthuSAM, Howling Wolf, LilyZ, you are great Americans.
I trust the medical profession as much as I do the government = 0.
Thanks for the restacks, ScrewWorm, Dee Dee, great Americans.
Most MDs would not accept chemo for themselves or for their family members. I think that some types of chemo are so toxic that they would finish off healthy people, too. Chemo has acquired such a bad name that the term "immunotherapy" has caught on to replace its name.
Coleman is highly respectable, and provides little-known details, but his account is incomplete (not that anything is perfect). He doesn't mention that diagnostics itself is a joke, no matter what the illness is:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-you-know-you-are-sick-or-how
Breast cancer is often caused by mammograms crushing a cyst where the body isolated cancerous cells. The radiation and the pressure don't do much good, either, and about half of the results are false positives or negatives:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/official-cancer-treatments
The other common misdiagnosis occurs in prostate cancer:
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-great-prostate-hoax
It’s very easy to walk the people who work in this field to admit that they aren’t practicing evidence based medicine.
If it's medical "advice" why do so many people flip out if the patient decides not to follow it?
Thanks so much for this. I knew there was a lot of bogus info given to women about DCIS, but I didn't realize how bad the data was for chemo for other forms of cancer. Before our screening tech got so advanced it could probably see the interior of an electron, DCIS was almost always an incidental finding at death. Most aggressive breast cancers hit women younger than the women getting DCIS diagnosis. The survival rates for the aggressive breast cancers haven't been getting better. But lumping in the DCIS patients (absent treatment, the 10 year survival rate is 99%) sure pumps up the "breast cancer survival rates."
Another important thing the Breast Cancer Industrial Complex wants us to ignore is that, while the vast numbers of women screened have no symptoms, that doesn't mean breast cancer has no symptoms. Breast cancer can cause changes to the size and shape of the breast, the texture of the skin, shape of the nipple, and can feel hot to the touch. But the mythology is that if you can find the cancer before there are symptoms, the cancer can be crushed before it spreads. Data does not show this.
Here's where the DCIS situation gets even worse. Mammogram machines, seeking ever smaller resolution are squeezing harder than they used to. DCIS is often encapsulated, which might explain why it's described as indolent and rarely spreading. But mammogram machines these days squeeze hard enough to rupture the capsule, so these otherwise slow growing cells are pushed into nutrient rich, highly vascular tissue. Metastasis that might not otherwise happen could be the result.
One also has to ask themselves. Is it really cancer cells they are seeing or diagnosing or are you just another statistic to increase the % of so called chemo cured people. I know of some who literally had no cancer but were put on chemo on the premise that whatever they had going on at the time would, could or might turn into cancer. This is how they also make money and increase the so called success rate. Look into fenbendazole (I don't like pharma but for some they may choose this path and it's working presently) or the likes of apricot kernels ie laetril Vitamin B17.
One must understand the scam of HIV aids, then they will understand that their also playing the same game with cancer in many instances. By now most who read these kinds of posts should understand that their PCR test and many others like it are simply smoke and mirrors where they can manipulate the data to get the result they want. Also look at SV40, Dr Mary's Monkey, also look at this video to see and understand more on how they set out to make cancer more lethal, this is a must watch. https://rumble.com/v3nc2wm-kill-shot-the-cias-sv40-simian-virus-cancer-weapon.html
Immunotherapy is the latest scam word it is chemotherapy. Another is Immuno suppressant drugs although one has to dig a little more, they don't like using this one because people are catching on. Anything to flat line your immune system and create more disease, they have the whole thing backwards. I can see with time the whole immune anything will become a thing of the past, they will even say that we don't have such a thing and that it is hocus pocus. They will say it's all genetic, they have been starting on that one too. Oh you will get cancer etc because well your sister, auntie etc got it. They will never look and see that those who didn't get such things were never injected with so called immunization. Also notice the immunization descriptor attached to injections has been waning and they are calling such vaccination, shots and injections. It's a sign of the times, as the public catches on they change the goal posts for the few who maybe awakening or doubting the pharma cartel/mafia and their peddlers of their wares.
Any so called immunization they want an immune response, they are slamming the body with foreign substances so that the immune system goes crazy, the more crazy the response the better for these people. Oh they try to find the balance where they don't kill the person outright, that's not good for future business or if it happens they hide it. If your body goes crazy or there is an immune response then they say it's working and it's good.
Imagine being told we are going to give you this and you may end up with fever, rashes or mild headache. It's a bit like self flagellation for the entertainment of the medical industry. Really what person in their right mind would have something injected and their body to rejects it, they get really sick and then say it's good. Utter madness.
SO hugely grateful for reading this article at this moment.
My husband was just diagnosed with metastasized throat cancer last week ( non smoker, light drinker, un jabbed) and we are reading chemo is the first thing standard care uses to treat this.
We’ve already ordered a slew of off label meds with the idea of following a version of William Makis, Joe Tippens, Merik/Hope protocols. And now knowing these facts now about chemo, it makes this alternative path much more confidence-inducing!!🙏
After the scamdemic, it takes SO much discernment to know who to trust. If anyone has dirt to share on any of these Dr’s names mentioned above, please share!
Truth at any cost.