Neil Oliver says 'We aren’t allowed the energy available from a century of gas beneath our feet here in Britain... But we’re paying top dollar for nine billion cubic litres of gas fracked by the US
I could be in a small minority about this, but I've been under the impression for nearly three years now that the idea that is currently being carried forth is actual GENOCIDE.
Yeah, you know, making freezing to death in the winter a real thing.
But I guess people still can't really get their brains around that. Surely it's a mistake?!?
I don't think it is a mistake. I think it's actually GENOCIDE.
Despite all the controversy about "Climate Change" we are fast heading into a real "Climate Catastrophe" while the Governments and their Build Back Better routine are doing everything they can to cause the starvation and literal freezing to death of as many people as possible.
Only an EMP attack is going to cause more and I'm sure that is planned for when it gets really cold enough, or in case of an armed revolution.
And check my last post, a cross-post from Courageous Lion, about the fact that OIL replenishes itself! NOT from dinosaurs, from decaying plants, I guess... But there's no effing scarcity AT ALL. It's the biggest psy op in history, and it's like an octopus, with all kinds of Arms of Death. I say, Fuck Those Oligarch Psycho Guys.
BTW, as Ritter explains eloquently here, we've thrown our "allies" including the UK and Germany under the bus. Best explanation of Trump and the Deep State "blob" I've ever seen.
Aside from a handful of dedicated activists who have stuck to their anti-war guns over the years, the peace movement has become a war movement, albeit an ersatz one.
My evidence? Just look at all the Ukrainian flags that have sprung up next to the on-line identities of those who once called George W. Bush a warmonger for his decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
"Last Sunday, Andrew Neil, GB News chairman and chief presenter, opted for the formal: “Good evening. I’m Andrew Neil and this is GB News.”
Oliver’s first words, in contrast, were: “Hello, it’s me!”
He carried on in the same way, expressing amazement at finding himself live on television and apologising to viewers for any technical hitches, saying: “I can absolutely guarantee that I will make mistakes. I will stumble, possibly literally. Forgive me, I ask that in advance.”
The Scots presenter of Coast then introduced a running order that stretched from the “lockdown hypocrisy” of politicians, to the Scotland-England game via an interview with Shaun Ryder of the Happy Mondays.
Complete with gremlins (there was trouble connecting with the Mondays’ front man and Oliver’s summary of the weather could not be heard initially), the show was representative of the channel’s first week. Quite the seven days it has been, too.
First came the reviews of the opening night, many of which focussed on the poor quality sound, the gloomy set, and the anti-lockdown monologue of Dan Wootton, whose show prompted 373 complaints to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom.
Next was an advertiser boycott led by the campaign group Stop Funding Hate, with brands including Grolsch and Pinterest pulling ads.
By the time pranksters began phoning in under false names it seemed the verdict was in on GB News, and it was not favourable. Yet there is another side to the GB News story, one that suggests those hoping for an early exit could be disappointed.
Take the advertiser boycott. True, some companies did withdraw but other big names, including Kellogg’s, Virgin Media and Ladbrokes, are still there. Moneysupermarket and Ikea were among firms that rowed back on their decisions, with the Swedish retailer saying that it was “simply too soon” to make an informed judgment."
The last Climate Optimum was 8500 years ago. In other words it has been cooling every since. That means we are about 17,000 years (most, all?) into this interglacial.
Odds are much greater it is coming to an end, either now or the sometime in the next 500 years, max. And near zero that the warming seen since the Little Ice Age means anything other than the regular up and down cycle of warming we always have irregardless of where we are in an interglacial.
Some argue that the warming we have seen is due to human causes because it has been so extreme, and of course they do this with a completely corrupted set of data points. The fact is, that even using their falsified data, the differences are not statistically significant!
I like what Professor Randolph Carson said, if we took all the energy ever created by man from campfires, conventional and nuclear weapons, power grids, fossil fuels, wind turbines, solar cells, nuclear reactors, steam, and anything else, we still couldn't melt all the ice in Antartica.
And what would happen to the ice that did melt? Oh, some of it might affect sea levels, or cloud formation and local climates, but mostly, what would actually happen is that the majority of the melted ice would re-freeze! You can't warm up space! Especially with the earth moving at massive speeds orbiting the sun, which is orbiting the galactic center, which is heading for an encounter with Andromeda billions of years into the future!
But these forests have not always been there, just like grasses are a comparatively recent phenomenon, yet the planets climate has still been stable and goes through cycles where many of these forests are covered by a mile of ice.
Such as the recent revelations about Antartica.
Humans have zero capacity to affect this by many orders of magnitude.
Those denying this are deluded by scam artists and climate charlatans as well as the entire politico system which only wants death and control.
Even a brief glance at the data proves we are in the middle of an Ice Age right now! Check the poles, both covered by ice. A lot of it.
These CO2 is poison people are insane, and only idiots would believe their position. CO2 has trended lower with each successive glaciation, which is most likely a bigger extinction threat than anything else.
I agree with your position, but it doesn't have anything to do with whether the glaciation will return or not.
Have you ever considered the fact that it may be the actions of governments is to speed the return of the glaciation? After all, it is the second fastest way to kill most of us, next to bioweapons.
I could be in a small minority about this, but I've been under the impression for nearly three years now that the idea that is currently being carried forth is actual GENOCIDE.
Yeah, you know, making freezing to death in the winter a real thing.
But I guess people still can't really get their brains around that. Surely it's a mistake?!?
I don't think it is a mistake. I think it's actually GENOCIDE.
And millions, like us, agree with you.
Absolutely, great comments.
Despite all the controversy about "Climate Change" we are fast heading into a real "Climate Catastrophe" while the Governments and their Build Back Better routine are doing everything they can to cause the starvation and literal freezing to death of as many people as possible.
Only an EMP attack is going to cause more and I'm sure that is planned for when it gets really cold enough, or in case of an armed revolution.
How do I know this?
Because it is what I would do if I were them!
And check my last post, a cross-post from Courageous Lion, about the fact that OIL replenishes itself! NOT from dinosaurs, from decaying plants, I guess... But there's no effing scarcity AT ALL. It's the biggest psy op in history, and it's like an octopus, with all kinds of Arms of Death. I say, Fuck Those Oligarch Psycho Guys.
SAVED
That is why fusion power is always 20 years away, since the 70s.
Always 20 to 25.
RIGHT?!?!? Bollocks!!!!!!
BTW, as Ritter explains eloquently here, we've thrown our "allies" including the UK and Germany under the bus. Best explanation of Trump and the Deep State "blob" I've ever seen.
https://youtu.be/Z90QcNYTjKc
Here too. Don't miss!!!
Scott Ritter:
The peace movement in America is dead.
Aside from a handful of dedicated activists who have stuck to their anti-war guns over the years, the peace movement has become a war movement, albeit an ersatz one.
My evidence? Just look at all the Ukrainian flags that have sprung up next to the on-line identities of those who once called George W. Bush a warmonger for his decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
https://www.scottritterextra.com/p/the-hell-with-the-peace-movement
Oh, it's "green" alright. SOYLENT green.
Best I can tell, Neil started the GB New monologue on June 19, 2021.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/19385841.neil-oliver-asks-forgiveness-gb-news-live-show-debut/
"Last Sunday, Andrew Neil, GB News chairman and chief presenter, opted for the formal: “Good evening. I’m Andrew Neil and this is GB News.”
Oliver’s first words, in contrast, were: “Hello, it’s me!”
He carried on in the same way, expressing amazement at finding himself live on television and apologising to viewers for any technical hitches, saying: “I can absolutely guarantee that I will make mistakes. I will stumble, possibly literally. Forgive me, I ask that in advance.”
The Scots presenter of Coast then introduced a running order that stretched from the “lockdown hypocrisy” of politicians, to the Scotland-England game via an interview with Shaun Ryder of the Happy Mondays.
Complete with gremlins (there was trouble connecting with the Mondays’ front man and Oliver’s summary of the weather could not be heard initially), the show was representative of the channel’s first week. Quite the seven days it has been, too.
First came the reviews of the opening night, many of which focussed on the poor quality sound, the gloomy set, and the anti-lockdown monologue of Dan Wootton, whose show prompted 373 complaints to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom.
Next was an advertiser boycott led by the campaign group Stop Funding Hate, with brands including Grolsch and Pinterest pulling ads.
By the time pranksters began phoning in under false names it seemed the verdict was in on GB News, and it was not favourable. Yet there is another side to the GB News story, one that suggests those hoping for an early exit could be disappointed.
Take the advertiser boycott. True, some companies did withdraw but other big names, including Kellogg’s, Virgin Media and Ladbrokes, are still there. Moneysupermarket and Ikea were among firms that rowed back on their decisions, with the Swedish retailer saying that it was “simply too soon” to make an informed judgment."
continues...
when the weather is hot, they call it "global warming". When the weather is cold, they call it "climate change". There are two youtube videos from the same "scientist", Dr. Miller, done 20+ years apart. In one, Dr. Miller says "coming Ice Age", https://youtu.be/L33cRgu54eU The other one, "disappearing ice caps", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2hbesz-Npk&t=27s&fbclid=IwAR0hGyQ6_CqkrFfv3aF_t3z7uaF2tkLXY7L755CLmzY9BD5z0y_wCDM3SHY
Hi Edwin,
Can you recall how long Neil Oliver has been doing his monologues?
When he started?
Ivan
I'm sorry, my comment somehow was not directed to you, but see above (or below) for the info and a link to commentary about his first show.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/19385841.neil-oliver-asks-forgiveness-gb-news-live-show-debut/
The last Climate Optimum was 8500 years ago. In other words it has been cooling every since. That means we are about 17,000 years (most, all?) into this interglacial.
Odds are much greater it is coming to an end, either now or the sometime in the next 500 years, max. And near zero that the warming seen since the Little Ice Age means anything other than the regular up and down cycle of warming we always have irregardless of where we are in an interglacial.
Some argue that the warming we have seen is due to human causes because it has been so extreme, and of course they do this with a completely corrupted set of data points. The fact is, that even using their falsified data, the differences are not statistically significant!
I like what Professor Randolph Carson said, if we took all the energy ever created by man from campfires, conventional and nuclear weapons, power grids, fossil fuels, wind turbines, solar cells, nuclear reactors, steam, and anything else, we still couldn't melt all the ice in Antartica.
And what would happen to the ice that did melt? Oh, some of it might affect sea levels, or cloud formation and local climates, but mostly, what would actually happen is that the majority of the melted ice would re-freeze! You can't warm up space! Especially with the earth moving at massive speeds orbiting the sun, which is orbiting the galactic center, which is heading for an encounter with Andromeda billions of years into the future!
But these forests have not always been there, just like grasses are a comparatively recent phenomenon, yet the planets climate has still been stable and goes through cycles where many of these forests are covered by a mile of ice.
Such as the recent revelations about Antartica.
Humans have zero capacity to affect this by many orders of magnitude.
The glaciation will return, period, full stop.
Those denying this are deluded by scam artists and climate charlatans as well as the entire politico system which only wants death and control.
Even a brief glance at the data proves we are in the middle of an Ice Age right now! Check the poles, both covered by ice. A lot of it.
These CO2 is poison people are insane, and only idiots would believe their position. CO2 has trended lower with each successive glaciation, which is most likely a bigger extinction threat than anything else.
I agree with your position, but it doesn't have anything to do with whether the glaciation will return or not.
Have you ever considered the fact that it may be the actions of governments is to speed the return of the glaciation? After all, it is the second fastest way to kill most of us, next to bioweapons.
Subscribed, and thanks.