Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics makes this shocking prediction!
He also said “Our model has ALWAYS picked up the shifts in capital flows that precede war. This time we are witnessing outflows not just from China, but also from ALL emerging markets on a scale that is simply unprecedented. The timing of outflows is clearly linked to Biden’s unprecedented sanctions against the Russian people – not just Russia itself as a political state. This has NEVER taken place in history before with the single exception of the US sanctions imposed on Japan and the freezing of all their assets in the United States which preceded Pearl Harbor.”
“It pains me to have to even write this today. But clearly, those who understand where this is going is to World War III and make no mistake about it – this is INTENTIONAL!”
Now if you ask the people of Ukraine, or for that matter, Russia, I think they would all say WAR is already here.
Of course he is not talking about some little “proxy war” but the real thing, the big dog so to speak.
I wrote this on another board:
"A weapon unused is a weapon wasted."
From "Spies Like US."
And what the hell, didn't "Nunn-Lugar" already waste literally thousands of weapons of Mass Destruction?
Think of all those poor orphan SS-18s that never got to complete their mission.
TEN independently targetable 2 Megaton warheads in each, wasted!
To say nothing of the refrigerated warheads containing hardened and resistant smallpox, anthrax, tularemia, what did the DOD analyst say?
"We knew they weren't sending beer."
Well, he got that absolutely ****ing right!
The leaked Soviet War plans showed us that in a invasion of Western Europe they planned on using something like 179 nuclear weapons on the first day.
This included using two 500 Kiloton bombs/missiles on Vienna, Austria, a neutral country.
Supposedly to deny the Allies the ability to utilize it, since every ****ing thing else would be destroyed.
I have never verified this, but in all likelihood, NATO had a similar plan. As a matter of fact, I would be shocked if our SIOP didn't.
So add about four 200 Kiloton Allied weapons to the mix. Maybe more, for battlefield preparation.
You know, at one time somewhere in the late 80s, the Allies SIOP had in the neighborhood of 450 nuclear weapons targeted on Moscow.
Why so many you might ask. Well, it was the ****ing missile defense! The one hundred interceptors there, which contained nuclear weapons themselves,
were each targeted by two of our own (or British) RVs, and of course with multiple warheads also intended for the battle management radars.
Now this was before the Superfuse, an interesting development in exploding the warhead at exactly the right spot to maximize damage.
Whether the accuracy is a little long, or short, or whatever. Actually they seem to aim just a little bit long now, which is better than being short.
See, the Superfuse can't do anything about being short, but a little long means it can time the explosion for maximum damage, and fallout.
Now nobody, at least I hope nobody developed this thing to increase fallout, but that is a natural consequence of blowing up shit in the ground
or buried deep below it.
And nobody, repeat that, no-****ing-body is better than the US at blowing up deep buried shit. Fallout be damned. Along with us.
Edwin
fascinating read!
I recently came across this article - http://www.zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Why%20Explosive%20Nuclear%20Devices%20May%20Not%20Exist.pdf
and was wondering if you would care to comment on it?