The MCC (a cricket club and possibly the world’s most woke organisation) claims that it purchases electricity from a wind farm in the Irish Sea. This may be so but unless a special cable runs from the wind farm to St John’s Wood in London, I am afraid that the electricity that the club uses (and which dribbles out of the sockets in the pavilion) comes from the National Grid, and the electricity in the National Grid contains the stuff produced from wind farms all mixed up with the stuff obtained from burning bits of tree, lumps of coal and oil and natural gas.
‘It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.’ President George Bush, 1992. (And yet, sadly, there are still Americans who think they are pledging allegiance to the flag.)
‘National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept,’ Zbigniew Brzenzinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.
‘We are grateful to The Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practised in past centuries.’ David Rockefeller at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting.
If you are travelling anywhere in a group buy an old TV camera (it doesn’t have to work), a tape recorder and a microphone on a stick and tell everyone you meet that you are making a TV documentary. You will be treated very well.
‘Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.’ – Balzac.
The current top-selling drug is a cancer immunotherapy product which is expected to bring in $24 billion this year. Oddly enough the Daily Mirror and a large UK cancer charity were distinctly unimpressed a quarter of a century ago when I founded a website devoted to the importance of the immune system in the treatment of cancer.
Gordon Brown did more than anyone else to destroy Britain. By introducing and enforcing targets, he destroyed the fabric of just about every part of our society. (If you want to know more please read ‘Gordon is a Moron’ by Vernon Coleman, which is available on Amazon.)
Countries have been manipulating the weather for decades. In 2005, President George W Bush and Vladimir Putin were waiting for Russia’s May Day parade to start. It was raining. ‘I didn’t think it ever rained on your parade,’ said Bush. Putin smiled. Within an hour the clouds cleared and the sun shone. ‘How did you do that?’ asked Bush. ‘We made it rain in the Ukraine’ answered Putin.
Thanks to social distancing, masks and other left over bits of covid nonsense, surgeons in the UK’s lamentable National Health Service now operate once a fortnight. They spend the other nine days dealing with administration and practising their social distancing techniques. The appallingly long waiting lists are just getting ever longer.
More and more car parks now require a special App before a motorist can pay to park their car. And there are 30 different parking Apps available so the chances of those with smart phones having the right App on their phone are low. And for the third of those over 65 who don’t own a smart phone there is no chance. There is a reason for this chaos, of course. The climate change psychos don’t want anyone travelling, and making it impossible for drivers to park helps cut down the travelling.
Psychologists have noticed (at last) that smart phones and social media are, separately and together, causing a massive increase in the incidence of mental health problems among children and teenagers. No one will do anything about this, of course. You will own nothing except a smart phone and you will be unhappy.
‘We die twice. Once when the breath leaves our body for the last time and once when the last person to know us says our name for the last time.’ – from the brilliant film ‘Stand up Guys’.
Man seems to have an irrepressible and unfathomable desire to be somewhere else, presumably in the belief, or at least the hope, that the somewhere else will in some respect be better than the wherever it is that they are at the moment. It is this driving force which pushes men and women and entire families to become vagabonds, perennially miserable gypsies, queuing on the motorway to get to the airport when they can queue and be humiliated and treated appalling and then herded into a tin tube and flown off (eventually) to some foreign country where they will be cheated and where the weather will be far too hot or very disappointing and the food will be too greasy or too something and they will need constant treatment with the medication they thoughtfully brought with them.
Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are already run by robots. You feed in a press release, press a button and out comes a neatly written news story. It isn’t widely known but I have heard it rumoured that the BBC hasn’t employed a live person for a decade or more.
I do wish that celebrities would never announce that they have been cured or given the all clear after a cancer diagnosis. Everyone diagnosed with cancer needs to make whatever lifestyle changes are appropriate and should remain vigilant. There is no cure and there is no all clear and those celebrities who make such announcements are not doing anyone any favours.
Today’s twenty somethings behave more like children than adults. But the age of 26 is a good measuring stick for the young. Orson Welles made Citizen Kane when he was just under 26. Dante wrote La Vita Nova when he was just over 26. Marco Polo arrived in Peking at the age of 26. Leonardo da Vinci was a master painter at 26. Michelangelo created Pieta when he was 26. Shakespeare wrote King Henry VI at 26. Napoleon was in charge of the French Revolution at 26. Alexander began his conquest of the world at 26. And Einstein announced his Theory of Relativity when he was 26.
The global economy is being deliberately destroyed by those who promote the Great Reset and who believe in the climate change myth. But what they are promoting is nothing more than old-fashioned communism. The climate change psychos should be honest and admit that they want everyone to be poor, hungry, cold and miserable. It’s called levelling down.
Tens of thousands of people from Hong Kong who moved to the UK are being banned from accessing their pension funds as punishment for migrating. Around 90,000 individuals are involved. Pension funds are likely to be an easy target for the globalists. This is, of course, a form of social credit. If you want to know about how social credit will affect you please read ‘Social Credit: Nightmare on Your Street’. You can purchase a copy via the bookshops on www.vernoncoleman.com and www.vernoncoleman.org
The majority of those under the age of 35 do not like or approve of democracy.
‘I looked, and there was a pale green horse. Its rider was named Biden and Zelensky accompanied him. They were given authority over a quarter of the earth, to kill with sword, famine and plague.’ – from the Book of Revelations. (I confess that I have changed two words. Death and Hades became Biden and Zelensky.)
9 Comments
7 more comments...No posts
Stuff you need to know about money
25TH MAY 2023
Money (real money) is one of the few weapons we have with which to fight the tyranny which we face together. Money is what they have used to give themselves power and money provides us with a tithe of the power we will need in order to survive.
You need to be able to save regularly, and to invest wisely. And most important of all you need to be able to make money with your own resources and to be able to make your money work for you.
Here are some basic facts about money that you should know.
A recession, deepening into a depression is inevitable. It is indeed part of the globalists’ deliberate policy. The twin menace of fake climate change and the Great Reset have been wildly underestimated by analysts and financial commentators who simply don’t understand that everything that is happening is happening on purpose. Nothing is happening by accident and there are no coincidences.
It is certain that taxes are going to continue rising indefinitely.
Anyone who banks online needs psychiatric care.
The mainstream media is bought and utterly unreliable. And 95% of what you see on the internet is also utterly unreliable. The media merely provides misinformation.
Natural gas prices go down at the end of each winter and then go up again at the start of each winter. Make of that what you can.
Investment professionals make money when you make money and they make money when you lose money. They never share your losses.
When financial experts all agree then they are usually wrong.
When investment professionals offer advice they are subjectively talking up their own book. In other words, they are biased and have an agenda which they do not share with you.
It is no longer safe to buy a share and hold it for life. Many well-known companies have disappeared entirely in the last few decades.
All shares are cyclical.
There are three prices for investments: cheap, fair and expensive. If you can buy cheap and sell expensive you will make money.
Before making an investment you should decide whether you want an income (through dividends) or a capital gain.
If an investment you have made does well you should consider selling a third when the price has doubled. Then sell another third when the price doubles again. Keep doing this so that you don’t lose money but do take profits.
You can find everything I know about money in my book Moneypower which is available on Amazon. My recent and future investment plans are summarised in my latest book They want your money and your life which is also available on Amazon.
The conspirators want to keep you ignorant. When you are ignorant you are vulnerable.
Financial markets are all manipulated and entirely dishonest. Remember that. Financial advisors, analysts, bankers, pension fund managers and financial journalists are all crooks. Remember that. They are not interested in helping you make money.
Generally speaking, investing is a zero sum game: someone loses and someone gains.
When the market runs out of buyers the price of anything will fall.
The number of reasons to buy a share, bond or other investment will increase as the price rises.
Investment is all about psychology and behaviour.
Don’t confuse ‘signals’ and ‘noise’. There is a real risk that you will take too much notice of the ‘noise’ and ignore the ‘signals’.
The Whooping Cough Vaccine
29TH MAY 2023
The following paper is taken from The Health Scandal by Vernon Coleman, published in 1988 by Sidgwick and Jackson and in 1989 by Mandarin Paperbacks. A new version of The Health Scandal is now available via the shop on this website.
The story of the whooping-cough vaccine provides us with another example of dishonesty and deceit in medicine.
There has been controversy about the whooping-cough vaccine for many years and the Department of Health and Social Security has consistently managed to convince the majority of medical staff to support the official line that the vaccine is both safe and effective. Once again the official DHSS line pays little attention to the facts. Put bluntly, the DHSS (on behalf of successive governments) has consistently lied about the risks and problems associated with the whooping-cough vaccine.
I'll explain exactly why I think that governments have lied (and this is not intended as a slight on any one political party – as far as I'm aware all political parties have followed exactly the same line on this matter) a little later. For the time being I'd like to concentrate solely on the facts.
The first point that should be made is that although official spokesmen claim otherwise, the whooping-cough vaccine has never had much of an influence on the number of children dying from whooping cough. The dramatic fall in the number of deaths caused by the disease came well before the vaccine was widely available and was, historians agree, the result of improved public health measures and, indirectly, the use of antibiotics.
It was in 1957 that the whooping-cough vaccine was first introduced nationally in Britain – although the vaccine was tried out in the late 1940s and early 1950s. But the incidence of whooping cough_, and the number of children dying from the disease, had both fallen very considerably well before 1957. So, for example, while doctors reported 170,000 cases of whooping cough in 1950 they reported only about 80,000 cases in 1955. The introduction of the vaccine really didn't make very much, if any, difference to the fall in the incidence of the disease. Even today, thirty years after the introduction of the vaccine, whooping-cough cases are still running at about 1,000 a week in Britain.
Similarly, the figures show that the introduction of the vaccine had no effect on the number of children dying from whooping cough. The mortality rate associated with the disease had been falling appreciably since the early part of the twentieth century and rapidly since the 1930s and 1940s – showing a particularly steep decline after the introduction of the sulphonamide drugs. Whooping cough is undoubtedly an extremely unpleasant disease but it has not been a major killer for many years. The DHSS has frequently forecast fresh whooping-cough epidemics but none of the forecast epidemics has produced the devastation predicted. My second point is that the whooping-cough vaccine is neither very efficient nor is it safe. The efficiency of the vaccine is of subsidiary interest – although thousands of children who have been vaccinated do still get the disease – the greatest controversy surrounds the safety of the vaccine. The DHSS has always claimed that serious adverse reactions to the whooping-cough vaccine are extremely rare and the official suggestion is that the risk of a child being brain damaged by the vaccine is no higher than one in 100,000. Now leaving aside the fact that I find a risk of one in 100,000 unacceptable, it is interesting to examine this figure a little more closely, for after a little research work it becomes clear that the figure of one in 100,000 is a guess.
Over the last decade or two, numerous researchers have studied the risks of brain damage following whooping-cough vaccination and their results make fascinating reading. Between 1960 and 1981, for example, nine reports were published showing that the risk of brain damage varied between one in 6,000 and one in 100,000. The average was a risk of one in 50,000. It is clear from these figures that the DHSS has simply chosen the figure which showed the whooping cough vaccine to be least risky. Moreover, the one in 100,000 figure did not come from any rock solid research. It was itself an estimate – a guess.
These are just a couple of the important facts about the whoopingcough vaccine that have been ignored or overlooked or disguised by the DHSS. But they are not the only facts that have been distorted.
Although the DHSS consistently claims that whooping cough is a dangerous disease, the figures show that it is not the indiscriminate killer it is made out to be. Whooping cough causes around four deaths a year in Britain. Compare that to approximately 300 deaths caused by tuberculosis and 100 deaths caused by meningitis. Most of the victims of whooping cough are babies under three months old. That fact is particularly important because the vaccine is never given to babies under three months old.
The truth about the whooping-cough vaccine is that it has always been a disaster. The vaccine has already been withdrawn in other countries because of the amount of brain damage associated with its use. In Japan, Sweden and West Germany the vaccine has been omitted from regular vaccination schedules. In America two out of three whooping-cough vaccine manufacturers have stopped making the vaccine because of the cost of lawsuits. On 6 December 1985 the Journal of the American Medical Association published a major report showing that the whooping-cough vaccine is, without doubt, linked to the development of serious brain damage. And even here in Britain the DHSS has been so worried about the vaccine that for ten years it has been paying research workers at Porton Down to search for ways to make a new, safer, more effective whooping-cough vaccine. At long last, after a £5 million research programme, a new vaccine is indeed being tested on children.
The final nail in the coffin lid is the fact that the British Government has already paid out compensation to the parents of some 800 children who have been brain damaged by the whooping-cough vaccine. Some parents who accepted damages a few years ago were given £10,000. More recently parents have been getting £20,000.
It is a startling fact that for many years now the whooping-cough vaccine has been killing or severely injuring more children than the disease itself. Since 1979 around 800 children (or their parents) have received money from the Government for vaccine-produced brain damage. In the same period less than 100 children have been killed by whooping cough. I think that makes the vaccine more dangerous than the disease. And that, surely, is quite unacceptable. So, why has the DHSS continued to encourage doctors to use the vaccine?
There are two possible explanations. The first explanation is the more generous of the two and concerns the Government's responsibility for the health of the community as a whole. The theory here is that by encouraging millions of parents to have their children vaccinated the Government can reduce the incidence of the disease in the community. In the long run this reduces the risk of there being any future epidemics of whooping cough. In other words the Government risks the lives of individual children for the good of the next generation.
The second, less charitable explanation is that the DHSS is looking after its own interests by continuing to claim that the whooping-cough vaccine is safe enough to use. In 1987 there were 258 sets of parents preparing to sue the DHSS for damages. They claim that the whooping-cough vaccine damaged their children. They are claiming something in the region of £250,000 each. If the DHSS withdrew the whooping-cough vaccine, it would be admitting that the vaccine was dangerous. And it would obviously lose its court cases. Such an admission would, therefore, cost it 258 times £250,000.
And that would be just the beginning for there are, you will remember, 800 sets of parents who have already received payments from the Government of either £10,000 or £20,000. If the DHSS admitted liability (and those payments did not include an admission of liability), then it is fair to assume that the DHSS would find itself with several hundred more lawsuits – and a damages bill running into billions of pounds.
Whatever explanation you consider most accurate the unavoidable fact is that the Government (in the form of the DHSS) has consistently lied about the whooping-cough vaccine, has distorted the truth and has deceived both the medical profession (for the majority of doctors and nurses who give these injections accept the recommendations made by the DHSS without question) and millions of parents.
The DHSS may have saved itself a tidy sum in damages. But the cost to the nation's health has been enormous. And this, remember, is merely one more example of the way in which the truth has been distorted by those whom we trust to provide us with honest, accurate advice about medicine and health care.